While Skip Gates Enjoys NYU-Sponsored Luxury…
Posted on May 19th, 2014 in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »
…emerging market laborers live and work in virtual slavery while building NYU’s Abu Dhabi outpost.
As the recipient of NYU’s largesse—a direct gift from the same president, John Sexton, who has pushed the NYU Abu Dhabi project—Skip Gates is now complicit in modern day slavery. For someone whose life and work are so deeply invested in exploring the terrible wrong of American slavery, this is problematic at best.
Virtually every one said he had to pay recruitment fees of up to a year’s wages to get his job and had never been reimbursed. N.Y.U.’s list of labor values said that contractors are supposed to pay back all such fees. Most of the men described having to work 11 or 12 hours a day, six or seven days a week, just to earn close to what they had originally been promised, despite a provision in the labor statement that overtime should be voluntary.
The men said they were not allowed to hold onto their passports, in spite of promises to the contrary. And the experiences of the BK Gulf strikers, a half dozen of whom were reached by The Times in their home countries, stand in contrast to the standard that all workers should have the right to redress labor disputes without “harassment, intimidation, or retaliation.”
Some men lived in squalor, 15 men to a room….
Skip Gates heavily subsidized apartment, which he apparently only uses on occasional weekends, has two bedrooms. Or, put another way, enough room to house 30 Bangladeshi workers…
4 Responses
5/21/2014 10:26 am
Richard, I’m going to hijack your blog for a moment and take advantage of the chance to address illustrious Harvard professors like Lewis, Thomas, Goldfarb, Ryan on a subject long puzzling to me.
It’s these Radcliffe fellowships and their “4%” acceptance rate. Why do so many of them go to tenured Harvard profs who have generous paid sabbaticals? Why and how do they need this added munifence? Or take the Guggenheim-why would a Jill Lepore bother to apply, and now receive, a chunk of money that would go to a worthy but unknown scholar who really needs the Guggenheim “stamp” and money — it’s not like that money buys her time to read and write, since every book she writes will have a big advance already plus she has sabbaticals too. Can someone explain this circus to me?
5/21/2014 1:19 pm
OK, I’ll bite, without knowing any of the facts or commenting on the particular people or institutions you mention. I would assume it’s about the pursuit of excellence being a competitive game. Scholars compete to be the best. Honor, fame, prizes, and money all accompany scholarly excellence. Research institutes compete to be the best. Universities compete to be the best, and so on. It’s a free market and everyone is trying to win. It’s the American way. Remember, the Ivies once got slammed with an antitrust violation for cooperating, which the DOJ construed as a cartel operation. America wants us to compete against each other.
Now sometimes this means that the rich get richer, and there are certainly some programs for scholars that self-consciously push back and favor the next generation over the existing stars. I actually think Radcliffe does that, though as I said, I am not up on the facts. But as everywhere in higher education, society is pretty clear about the incentive and reward structure. To tie this comment to the actual post, look at how NYU chooses to spend its money, perhaps in the hope of nabbing a Harvard star. And on the other side, Bard College gets slammed for educating prisoners, who should in the view of some NY legislators be rotting in their dungeons, not getting a college education at someone else’s expense.
Is it really unsurprising if you look at the incentives and rewards?
5/21/2014 2:55 pm
Thanks, Harry — really all I needed to know. The question was, if you’re a Harvard professor, what’s the advantage to getting a Radcliffe fellowship? And you’re not saying it’s extra income, or gets you a teaching release, or a second year off every 7 on top of the 1st you’re entitled to… it’s pure prestige (plus, to be fair, a collaborative multidisciplinary environment, change of pace and scenery etc.)
But isn’t a form of cannibalizing? Give a Harvard prof a Radcliffe fellowship, that’s a year they’re not teaching Harvard students.
5/22/2014 3:27 pm
Dear Anon,
The message you took away from HL’s post was not quite true. For the younger academics, the money is important. They get half salary on sabbatical. For most of them this would mean that they could take off only one semester. A full year leave (which means 16 months) is a lot more productive, for research or book-writing. The money from the RI enables them to spend the whole year off.
There are other sources of money in the sciences, but very, very few in the humanities.
— W.G.