Lies at the New Yorker
Posted on July 30th, 2012 in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »
I love and admire the New Yorker; it’s the pinnacle of magazine writing and reporting. But this is what happens when you don’t seem to care whether your hip, star reporters are reporters or corporate shills.
From the Times:
Jonah Lehrer, the staff writer for The New Yorker who apologized in June for recycling his previous work in articles, blogs and his best-selling book “Imagine,” resigned from the magazine, he said in a statement.
Mr. Lehrer faced new questions about his work on Monday in an article in the online magazine Tablet that reported that he had admitted to fabricating quotes attributed to Bob Dylan….
I guarantee you, this won’t be the last shoe to drop in this story.
What’s going on here is larger than the New Yorker, or course: It’s the phenomenon of writers who care about their research and prose only insofar as it gets them speaking gigs, corporate appearances and so on. In other words, it’s another consequence of the Gladwell Effect, a term I coined some years back. (Weirdly, it hasn’t caught on.)
This kind of thing happens when a type of professional feels that society insufficiently appreciates his work for its own merits; in other words, it’s part of the existential crisis of journalism. And so it’s not really surprising to me that this scandal involves someone who writes for the New Yorker’s website. The journalistic values of a media website should be exactly the same as that of a print publication; more often than not, they aren’t—because of the advertising model—how do you get people to actually look at those obnoxious ads—because websites are seen as less fundamental than printed versions, because they’re a training ground for young (read: low-paid) journalists, and because many of the people who write for the web were trained in technology more than journalism….
4 Responses
7/30/2012 3:48 pm
A graduate of Columbia and a Rhodes Scholar (according to Wikipedia). Where do people like this become unhinged? Or has he been fudging all along? He sounds for all the world like an undergrad called up for plagiarism, offering denials followed by excuses followed by pathetic apologies. Yuck.
7/30/2012 5:15 pm
If he knew anything about Dylan and Dylanology he would never have dreamed of doing this. There is no way a “new” quote from Dylan from the 60s or 70s would not have gotten incredible scrutiny, including from Jeff Rosen and Dylan’s own organization, which keeps a close eye on this sort of thing. Stupid!
7/31/2012 6:50 pm
Rich,
Any comparisons/contrasts with this story and the matter of fabrication by Stephen Glass (besides the obvious one of type of material written, i.e. quotes vs. articles)? That was one of the first things that came to mind when reading this. Thanks!
8/2/2024 11:25 am
For those interested, the first trace of Dylan’s new album “Tempest” (due out 9/11) from the new song “Early Roman Kings,” can be found on the opening soundtrack of a new Cinemax series, “Strike Back”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHLsThejspo
Sort of Muddy Waters-style 12 bar blues, and the the lyrics suggest the Roman Kings have to do with hiphop (of which Dylan has long been an admirer), as some have already pointed out, rather than my sort of Roman kings:
http://www.myhiphop.it/wp-content/uploads/mvdv4900_roman_kings-485×374.jpg
But we’ll have to wait for the album to know for sure. Probably a bit of both, given his recent intertexts from Virgil and Ovid.
He’ll be in the Boston Garden Nov. 18, with Mark Knopfler as guest guitarist. So Dire Straits fans (like you, Richard?) might be interested.