More thoughts on A-holes
Posted on July 22nd, 2011 in Uncategorized | 10 Comments »
Larry Summers’ remarks are often clever on initial hearing and then, with some consideration, turn out to be more revealing about the man than about his subjects.
With that in mind, I keep turning to his comment regarding the Winklevosses—not that they were assholes, though that’s certainly psychologically quite interesting—but this one:
“Rarely have I encountered such swagger, and I tried to respond in kind.”
The line got a laugh at the Fortune conference where it was delivered, but it’s been overshadowed by the vulgarity which preceded it.
Even so, it’s fascinating in and of itself, so let’s deconstruct that line and consider what it really says about Larry Summers.
First: “Rarely have I encountered such swagger.”
For the sake of argument, let’s posit that the WInklevoss twins manifested “swagger.” It’s a dubious point, given the context of the situation—two students appealing to the Harvard president for help—and evidenced only by the curious objection that they had dressed up to meet the president of Harvard.
But as I say, for the sake of argument….
Larry Summers at this point had been an MIT student, a Harvard graduate student, a Harvard professor, deputy Treasury secretary, Treasury secretary and president of Harvard. He had met with the greatest minds—and largest egos—of academia. He had probably encountered every major American political leader. Not to mention numerous heads of state, including probably a few authoritarian ones. Heck, one of his best friends had ripped off the governments of Russia and the United States—that’s some swagger.
And yet—the Winklevosses, a couple college kids, are right up there in the swagger department?
Curious.
It’s hard not to think that Summers was threatened by them—not physically, at least, not physically from anything they did—but culturally. For Summers, they represented the old Harvard—WASP Harvard. And Summers didn’t like that. WASPS make him uncomfortable.
So what does he do?
“I tried to respond in kind.”
Pause to consider this behavior. Allowing again for the sake of argument that the Winklevosses were full of swagger, they were still two college kids petitioning the president of Harvard for help in a dispute.
Whereas Summers was…the president of Harvard. Sitting in his office, in the building devoted to him. Supposed to be older, more mature, more responsible. After all, he dealt with students—young people—every day, right?
But his manner of dealing with the alleged swagger is to “respond in kind.”
There’s really only one conclusion to draw from this behavior: That it is deeply, profoundly immature. Childish, you might even say. It is certainly not the mark of a leader; that person is supposed to be a role model, not someone who reacts to perceived immature behavior by, well, being just as immature. (And then subsequently boasting about it.)
As unpleasant and surreal as all this must be for the Winklevosses, remember the larger stakes: Larry Summers has had to deal with lots of very powerful people about very important issues affecting the lives of millions. And yet, in terms of his emotional intelligence, he acts, by his own admission, like a child. It’s not very confidence-inspiring.
10 Responses
7/22/2011 10:44 am
“Rarely have I encountered such swagger.”
I guess he doesn’t look in the mirror very often.
7/22/2011 8:53 pm
“Public controversies and internal dissatisfactions marked Summers’s tenure as president, but too much has been made of his personality and his management style in explaining his downfall. Surely he was as much of a bully as a bull in a china shop, and his contempt extended not just to individuals but to entire fields of study, but none of that would have mattered if his ideas had been inspiring.” — EWAS, p. 259
I took some heat for that.
7/23/2011 2:34 pm
“The president receives lots of correspondence from alumni, and I’d imagine will respond directly in due course.” — A Harvard spokesman, when contacted about the Winklevosses’ letter to President Faust.
I am a little surprised by this statement. Both halves of it are true, I’m sure. But President Faust, and those speaking for her, have always taken pains to be respectful and polite, even in their non-responses. Don’t I hear a back-handed wave in the first clause? Or perhaps even Harvard’s careful PR folks can let the heat get to them, when some damned Globe reporter from the entertainment and celebrity page calls them, at 6pm on a hundred-degree day, about the last thing the president wants to comment on!
7/23/2011 11:26 pm
President Faust has the opportunity to come across as the person of distinction that she is by making a public statement that clearly conveys her expectation that all Harvard faculty refer to students and graduates in ways that are respectful and civil. She does not need to refer to Summers directly, or to this episode specifically. If she makes this statement soon, the timing will make clear to all what it is that she is talking about, and will help her ride above it all. She could also privately reach out to Summers and indicate that this kind of behavior is unbecoming of a Harvard Professor, and keep a copy of the letter for her records, because with Summers you never know when he is going to shoot from the hip.
Silence on her part, however, would convey that she does not have the confidence to stand up to Summers, and this could in time turn into more complicated challenges as he feels no need to contain his impulses.
7/24/2011 11:13 am
It is my understanding that, at various times in the past decade, Corporation members past and present and former Presidents have taken Larry Summers aside and suggested that he alter hits presentation of self. Doesn’t seem to me that such ‘trips to the woodshed’ have had much comments. In general I favor comments from those in office but in this particular case, Jon Stewart may be a better mouthpiece.
7/24/2011 11:15 am
(better proofreading)
It is my understanding that, at various times in the past decade, Corporation members past and present and former Presidents have taken Larry Summers aside and suggested that he alter his presentation of self. Doesn’t seem to me that such ‘trips to the woodshed’ have had much effect. In general I favor comments from those in office but in this particular case Jon Stewart may be a better mouthpiece.
7/25/2011 4:48 am
How did the Crimson obtained the email the Winklevosses sent to President Faust?
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/7/23/winklevoss-email-to-faust-summers/
There are three possibilities:
1. The Winklevosses sent it themselves to the Crimson
2. President Faust did
3. Someone else in the President office did
Let us hope #1 is the winner, for the other two raise questions about the ethics of the President or her staff in sharing private correspondence with the press. Hopefully the diligent Crimson editors will clear this potential misunderstanding up.
7/25/2011 6:29 am
“Today, we have an update. Over the weekend, we got a call from a Harvard legacy (who asked to remain anonymous) who told us that when he first met Summers, the then-Harvard-prez declined to shake his hand, too. According to this graduate, he asked Summers why he was opposed to shaking hands, and Summers explained that he avoids handshakes in general because he’s a bit of a germaphobe.” — Boston Globe
7/25/2011 6:35 am
Interesting. But I’ve seen Summers shake hands with people.
That also doesn’t explain the feet on the desk….
7/25/2011 9:07 am
The Winklevosses have a lot of money (now and before). Makes you wonder what Alumni Affairs and Development thinks of this episode. Summers would appear to be a liability in terms of long-term relations with potential donors, if nothing else.