The Pope is Like Jesus?
Posted on March 29th, 2010 in Uncategorized | 8 Comments »
The former Nazi appears to have a pattern of covering up child molestation by priests. But yesterday, the New York Post reports, New York’s new archbishop, Timothy Dolan, compared the criticism of the pope to “‘the same unjust accusations, shouts of the mob and scourging at the pillar’ suffered by Christ.”
“Sunday Mass is hardly the place to document the inaccuracy, bias and hyperbole of such aspersions,” Dolan told parishioners, “but Sunday Mass is indeed the time for Catholics to pray for Benedict our pope.”
“The recent tidal wave of headlines about abuse of minors by some few priests — this time in Ireland, Germany and a rerun of an old story from Wisconsin — has knocked us to our knees again,” he said.
In other words, take my word for it—the Pope is innocent.
I don’t think there are many American Catholics who will take this argument on faith. The Church has been too battered in recent years; faith in God is not the same as faith in priests.
Does anyone really believe, for example, that the number of pedophile priests was “some few”?
And labeling the Wisconsin scandal a “rerun of an old story”—even though no one’s ever heard of it before and the church has for years tried (still is trying) to hush it up—is pure political spin, cynicism in a way that challenges faith.
By the way, here’s another funny argument, from Times conservative columnist Ross Douthat (who himself, in an initiation into a similar kind of priesthood, once went skinny-dipping with William F. Buckley, Jr. But never mind.)
Emphasis added:
In reality, the scandal implicates left and right alike. The permissive sexual culture that prevailed everywhere, seminaries included, during the silly season of the ’70s deserves a share of the blame, as does that era’s overemphasis on therapy. (Again and again, bishops relied on psychiatrists rather than common sense in deciding how to handle abusive clerics.)
This is a fine example of a silly Washington habit of trying to fit everything into a conservative/liberal dichotomy—and then blaming the liberals.
Bishops turned to psychiatrists as a means of keeping these matters out of the criminal justice system—and the headlines—not because they believed in psychiatry because they were infused by the “permissive sexual culture” of the day. I’d like to see one shred of documentation of that; I’m no expert on this, but I’d bet that the Church was railing against that sexual culture.
What’s more interesting is why it turned for help to psychiatrists and not other priests.
8 Responses
3/29/2010 9:45 am
If Benedict is a “former Nazi,” then so is every German man above the age of 80. God knows there’s enough to criticize him for without bringing up this sensationalist half-truth again, as so many others have done since his election in 2005.
3/29/2010 9:55 am
http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/pope-benedict-nazi-salute.jpg
3/29/2010 10:03 am
It has really only been in the past very few years that legal and psychiatric experts have come to the conclusion that the chances of rehabilitating a pedophile successfully are very small to nil. I think that is a very important factor to consider before people rush to judgment. Consider the number convicted who are repeat offenders, even after long and many incarcerations.
3/29/2010 10:16 am
10:03 here, it follows, unfortunately that the priesthood provided safety and opportunity for pedophiles. This has nothing to do with celibacy, nor likely the permissiveness of sex in the 70’s or even today. Pedophilia is in a class by itself.
3/29/2010 10:30 am
I think what galls me most is the hypocrisy of the church, especially when it comes to things sexual. I know of what I speak, as I can say that I’ve been there, done that. Back in the 60’s and 70’s it was common knowledge in certain circles that some priests were having affairs, some priests had fathered children, some priests were gay, openly spending vacations together, etc. Their actions were known to some of their fellow priests, after all these guys all lived together, sharing meals, and just hanging out and watching TV. And these same priests would preach against adultery and homosexuality. One of the better anecdotes (true) is the one of my parish priest retiring to his family’s home and taking along his “housekeeper.” Granted these are all consenting adults and not on the same level with the pedophile priests. But it’s the hypocrisy that gets to me. It’s been here forever and as long as there is the patriarchal governance and protection of one’s own, it will never go away.
3/29/2010 12:51 pm
I agree that the hypocrisy exists. If priests were allowed to marry, that would eliminate some of these issues. If priests were not required by the church to be celibate, that would eliminate other issues. The church’s stand against homosexuality is based on one verse in the Old Testament, not the New Testament which is the basis of Christianity. You could change all these things and eliminate the hypocrisy, and dissolve every church but you would still be left with the pedophilia and I believe the only solution to this lies in science. Genetics possibly?
3/30/2010 8:19 am
12:51 PM here. Actually, apparently homosexuality is more likely to be genetic and that makes sense. I know a couple of cousins that were clearly gay from an early age, they were raised in different parts of the country in stable homes. I could turn my whole family upside down and wouldn’t find any. Either scenario happens to be fine with me, I don’t have a problem with it. Pedophilia, on the other hand is apparently more likely to be neurological in nature or to do with the endocrine system, so the answer still clearly lies in science. All I know is if you are, you are and if you aren’t, you aren’t. In most cases it is not a matter of choice and apparently in some cases it can be “iffy”, just as in homosexuality. Can’t speak for the “iffy” people as I’ve never been there so I wouldn’t like to sit in judgment on them. Homosexuality is harmless, as far as I am concerned, and pedophilia not good at all. Perhaps if more time were spent worrying about what causes pedophilia and less time spent worrying about homosexuals, we might have found the answer to the far more dangerous of the two.
Any comments?
3/31/2010 1:53 pm
9:55, have you ever been to a Catholic mass? Did you notice that Ratzinger’s left arm was cropped out of that picture?