Harry Lewis on the Secret Seven
Posted on January 12th, 2010 in Uncategorized | 23 Comments »
Writing for the Huffington Post, Harry Lewis continues to speak out about the Secret Seven, a.k.a. the Harvard Corporation.
His piece is titled: “Larry Summers, Robert Rubin: Will the Harvard Shadow Elite Bankrupt the University and the Country?
After Harvard’s near-bankruptcy, Lewis writes,
In this era of heightened corporate accountability, one might have expected instead a shake-up of Harvard’s board. But Harvard’s directors are invulnerable.
…[But] the Corporation is stunningly secretive. The members are listed on a Harvard web page-but with no contact information. Their meetings and agendas are unannounced, their decisions unreported. The Fellows, scattered across the country, are isolated from the institution they govern. Even the university’s statutes-the closest thing to a constitution limiting the Corporation’s discretionary power-are almost impossible to locate. The colonial-era board structure is failing the modern university.
Lewis goes on to inform/remind the HuffPo audience that some of Harvard’s shadow elite were involved in the massive corruption scandal that showed Russia that, when it comes to democracy and transparency, Americans don’t always practice what we preach.
Engaged by the U.S. to show the Russians how the West controls corruption, the [Harvard] advisers became models of what to avoid.
Lewis’ full piece is well worth reading, but here is his conclusion:
The modern power elites thrive by forgetting any regrettable past. This amnesia is easy at Harvard, where the legal fiduciaries operate in secret and need not answer for their acts. They are the antipodes of the selfless institutional servants who built Harvard and other great American enterprises, and they bear close watching.
This amnesia is a massive problem at Harvard, where people are busy and pressuring the Corporation is largely a thankless task. Lewis has done so on multiple occasions—on this blog, in the Globe, on HuffPo now, making himself available for media interviews when other professors are reluctant to do so. Kudos to him, but he can’t do it alone; the Secret Seven will do everything it can to marginalize a single voice, no matter how lucid that voice may be. Whether it’s at Harvard or in, say, the former East Germany, this is the nature of secretive power.
Harry Lewis is right, but being right isn’t always enough, especially in a battle against secret power; some other folks need to start stepping up to the plate.
23 Responses
1/12/2023 10:15 am
Q: Will Richard Bradley stop whinging about DFG’s not being up to the task, as if he weren’t some kind of pretentious ignorant name-dropping pipsqueak?
A: No.
1/12/2023 10:34 am
A pretentious ignorant name-dropping pipsqueak?
Here, I’ll prove your point.
“That’s the best insult I’ve gotten since Don Henley called me a buttoned-down Brooks Brothers bonehead.”
Which he did once.
1/12/2023 2:40 pm
Excellent article Mr. Lewis. You are taking the kinds of intellectual risks that professors were, once upon a time, admired for. Your boldness will make some of your colleagues uncomfortable, because it will remind them of what they have long decided not to do: raise difficult and important questions about the nonsense that is now the norm at your university.
1/12/2023 2:52 pm
Borrowing continues at Harvard. Another $480 million…
Given the problems Harry Lewis describes -secrecy, lack of accountability- is it possible that the financial crisis at Harvard is far, far more serious than what has percolated to the public so far? After all, it took a year for the news of the gambling with the cash account to become public, and the practices of ‘leveraging’ the bank went on for years, unknown to most, including some who should have known.
Someone asked last summer whether Harvard could go bankrupt? Was that just a random question? The analysis that accompanied the question was, with hindsight, prophetic.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/could-harvard-go-bankrupt/ivory-tower/
1/12/2023 3:00 pm
Anon 2:52, let’s leave the rhetorical questions aside. If you’ve got some cards to play, put ’em on the table. Otherwise you’re just stirring the pot.
1/12/2023 3:01 pm
With apologies for the mixed metaphors.
1/12/2023 3:24 pm
Shame about Don Henley, because he is beyond cool…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KQCqBDCbIA
1/12/2023 3:37 pm
Is the extra G for Gilpin?
1/12/2023 3:42 pm
It’s an Australianism.
1/12/2023 3:55 pm
I think it’s just as much a Britishism. I heard it a lot when I was in the UK.
1/12/2023 4:15 pm
Mr. Lewis, thank you for being brave and overcoming the professional and (possibly) personal rebuke of critiquing what appears to be an untouchable institution.
Like RB, I hope others join your bandwagon of inquiry before the damage becomes so overwhelming, it will take decades to fix. Hopefully, your PR people can get you in papers like the Wall Street Journal and the Economist.
1/12/2023 6:19 pm
Yes, well done, Harry. The Huffpo comments are a study in themselves.
1/12/2023 8:57 pm
Harry’s piece is excellent.
1/12/2023 9:37 pm
In the winter of 2020 Harry Lewis looked out the window of his Harvard office. As he thought about the situation of the University that winter he remembered how a decade earlier he had decided to share publicly what he knew about the inadequate governance of the University… he had not made that decision lightly… that decision had unleashed a series of events that would forever change Harvard’s circumstances amidst a serious financial crisis for the University… as he reflected on the events of the last ten years Harry thought also about those among his colleagues who had followed his lead. He thought also of those who chose to remain silent. And from the vantage point of the winder of 2020 Harry understood clearly how…
1/12/2023 10:34 pm
Hi Anon 10.15am, are you fishing for IPs?
http://www.ethicalhacker.net/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,54/topic,1047.msg3293/
1/13/2010 9:17 am
Harry always say these are hard to find. They’re not. Just do a little poking around at the university archives website, and you get this
http://hul.harvard.edu/huarc/refshelf/FoundingDocuments.htm
1/13/2010 9:42 am
I mean the current ones, which have been revised since that 1835 edition!
1/13/2010 11:01 am
By the way, I do know how to find a copy on the web that is only a few years old, and may even be current though it was not posted in the past year or two. I leave it as an exercise to the digital sleuths among you to find it.
1/13/2010 12:10 pm
Dear anon 10:34 p.m. We are not Anon 10.15am fishing for IPs. Just now checked to see why the fan club was so popular on Monday. Am somewhat embarrassed. Though we stand by our stance of being fed up with RB’s constant blah blah blah.
1/13/2010 1:41 pm
Why are we using the royal we, Miss Grimke?
And why, if we are so excited about Drew Faust we’ve actually started a blog, don’t we identify ourselves?
1/13/2010 4:39 pm
Q: Will Harvard go broke?
A: The top 10 US endowments have outperformed the MSCI global index by 5.2 per cent over the past 20 years. For each $1 invested, there has been an incremental $5 gain.
Hopefully, DGF’s secondary schooling at Concord Academy, enabled her to be able to multiply numbers. Clearly her fans at the DGF Fan Club cannot do so.
1/16/2010 8:08 pm
I suspect that Miss Grimke is DGF herself. No one else has any enthusiasm for the woman. Miss Grimke’s blog is also odd, off-key, …, just plain out of touch. It actually seems like something DCG might write.
1/17/2010 5:41 pm
Is it possible that DGF reads this blog? Or perhaps even occasionally contribute to the blog?