Caroline Kennedy and the Eloquence Issue
Posted on December 31st, 2008 in Uncategorized | 9 Comments »
The New York Post reports that New York mayor Michael Bloomberg defended Caroline Kennedy from criticism of her stumbling speech patterns.
(A great Post headline, by the way: Mayor Takes “Um”-Brage at Kennedy Critics.”)
“Caroline Kennedy isn’t just your average person, so people may be a little more critical,” said Bloomberg, who has repeatedly praised Kennedy since she threw her name into the hat to replace Hillary Rodham, Clinton in the Senate.
Two problems with this argument.
One, you can’t say that Kennedy isn’t “your average person,” and then not expect her to be held to higher standards than, say, your average person. That’s the whole point of not being average.
And two, it doesn’t much help Kennedy to suggest that she’s a celebrity, or a member of an elite, or whatever.
Finally—okay, three problems—Bloomberg’s defense of Kennedy only reinforces the [accurate] perception that he is backing her. But as a commenter below noted, there is so much hostility towards Bloomberg in New York right now that having him in your corner is like being endorsed by OJ Simpson.
The Post also throws in this wicked little gem:
During a 40-minute interview with The Post on Saturday, [Kennedy] uttered “you know” more than 200 times.
This is a tough town sometimes. But when you think about it, it’s a fair point. These verbal hesitations manifest a larger character question. Does Caroline Kennedy, you know, really want the job?
9 Responses
1/1/2024 8:56 am
This is my take on your whole Caroline Kennedy is not a lawyer, or an author, and is a bad speaker and would be a bad senator brouhaha. When you worked at George, she didn’t like you from day one. She didn’t support your writing about John after his death and that pissed you off. Because you went bankrupt and you blamed her for it. Even though you goofed off for a while in Australia (your choice) and John specifically said at your hire he didn’t want anyone to write about him in the tabloids (but you did anyway). I’m sure he meant a coworker tell-all as well. Sour grapes. You have sour grapes, my friend. You see a chance to exact your pound of flesh and you are attempting to take it. I think you are a hard worker and can be a charming and interesting guy, but I wish you would let this go, before it bites you in the butt. Happy New Year.
1/1/2024 11:55 pm
That seems a bit nasty, Anonymous 8:56, and further seems falsely to imply that RB is alone in having these doubts and questions–far from the case, as a moment’s googling will reveal. If I lived in NY, Minnesota, or Illinois, I would be very much engaged with questions of senatorial elections and appointments, worth and likely effectiveness of appointees, anti-democratic tendencies, and the like.
I think when you come up with the sort of stuff you come up with you should either doff your anonymity (unless you’re a vulnerable employee of RB) or, if your closing sentiment is heartfelt, should communicate with him off list.
1/2/2024 10:14 am
I agree, RT. You’re just being mean, anon 8:56.
1/2/2024 10:43 am
I’d bet my Bama-ball tickets that anon 8:56 is an ex of some sort. “I think you are a hard worker and can be a charming and interesting guy, but…” is a sure tip-off.
1/2/2024 9:59 pm
I’m not an ex. Never met him. But I read his book and also this blog occasionally. I just don’t care to hear about another scandal involving the Kennedys and Mr. Bradley. If you can dish it, you have to be able to take it, so I put my 2 cents in. Can’t see what’s wrong with that. She’s going to be senator. Mark my words. So if I were you, I’d tread lightly here. Take that for what it is worth.
1/2/2024 10:48 pm
Tread lightly or else what?
1/2/2024 10:48 pm
And Anonymouse - You lost that bet. But keep your tix. I have my own.
1/3/2024 2:38 am
Just sitting here thinking how magnanimous Richard would have looked if he had supported Caroline. Under the circumstances, I suppose that would have been impossible, but it sure would have been something. Being magnanimous is an undervalued character trait, isn’t it? We don’t see that very often in politics or even in life.
1/3/2024 1:33 pm
There’s no “or else” from me. Just common sense here. I’m done on this issue.