What Happened at Harvard?
Posted on November 25th, 2008 in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
The LA Times and the Boston Globe both report on Harvard’s mysterious—and now embarrassing—withdrawal of its tenure offer to economist Christina Romer, who was just named head of the National Economic Council.
The LA Times:
“She’s a great choice,” said Harvard University economics professor Gregory Mankiw, who chaired the economic council from 2003 to 2005 and is a longtime friend of Romer’s. “She’s a very good economist, a great public speaker, and . . . brings to the table an understanding of history that most economists don’t have.”
…But Christina Romer’s appointment was vetoed by Summers’ successor, Drew Faust, Harvard’s first female president. David Romer then turned down his appointment and the couple remained at Berkeley.
So what happened, Professor Mankiw?
The Globe:
Romer, who is 49, received her PhD from MIT in 1985. Earlier this year she and her husband, fellow Berkeley economist David Romer, were in line for tenured positions at Harvard University, until Harvard president Drew Gilpin Faust unexpectedly rejected her bid without explanation.
…“She’ll be weighing in on the side of a large stimulus,” said J. Bradford DeLong, a fellow Berkeley economist.
DeLong was among the economists at both Harvard and Berkeley who were critical of Faust’s decision not to grant Romer a tenured position at Harvard. The Harvard Crimson reported in May that Harvard’s economics department had approved the job offer, but that Faust had vetoed it and declined to explain her decision.
Dear Globe: Harvard’s first female president rejects female economist for department which has reputation for being anti-female. Economist is then chosen for important White House job, making Harvard look silly at best.
Could somebody please report this story?
2 Responses
11/25/2008 9:52 am
Let me suggest some more specific questions a reporter should ask:
— Did Faust chair this ad hoc, or was this one that she delegated to the provost?
— Why did Faust and/or Hyman feel that they could not override the opposition of a minority of the economics department in this case?
— New (at the time) FAS Dean Smith would have seen that the case had problems before it went to the ad hoc. In particular, professors who had not publicly opposed the appointment would have written negative letters to him about Romer. Under these circumstances, why was this case sent forward to the ad hoc? Were attempts made to address the concerns raised by professors before sending it forward?
-What, if any, repercussions has the economics department felt for its bad behavior in this case?
-What steps have since been taken to reduce the probability that episodes like this will happen again?
11/26/2008 10:31 am
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=525611