Theda Skocpol Calls It a Day
Posted on March 27th, 2007 in Uncategorized | 34 Comments »
Theda Skocpol, dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, has resigned the position effective the end of this school year. (See Jeremy Knowles’ e-mail below.)
A few things about Skocpol:
1) She is generally thought to have done a good job as GSAS dean.
2) She is considered a candidate for the FAS deanship, and is said to want the job.
3) She has been GSAS dean for two years, an unusually short term.
4) She is a senior adviser in the social sciences at the Radcliffe Institute, and last week gave a talk at its annual luncheon for women faculty, hosted by Drew Faust…..
How does Skocpol’s move affect the question of who Faust will chose as her FAS dean? Does it mean that she’s willing to walk away from Harvard if she doesn’t get the job? Or that she already has another offer? Or just that she wanted to step down and, if she didn’t get the FAS post, didn’t want it to look like sour grapes by resigning immediately afterward?
Got me. All I know is, the timing is curious and the plot thickens…..
I am writing to let you know that Theda Skocpol has today announced her
intention to step down as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and
Sciences, effective at the end of this academic year. This is, of
course, unwelcome news to those of us who know first-hand of the skilled
and energetic leadership she has brought to this role, and of the many
improving initiatives that she has launched to strengthen the Graduate
School.
Since becoming Dean in July 2005, Theda has arranged for virtually all
graduate students in the humanities and the social sciences to receive
dissertation completion fellowships, she has helped to institute a new
innovation prize and seed grant program to honor and reward improvements
in graduate education, she has launched secondary fields for those in
Ph.D. programs to promote interdisciplinary research, she has created
the Graduate Policy Committee to involve faculty in the formulation of
GSAS policy, she has overseen the move of the Graduate School from
Byerly Hall to Holyoke Center, and she has encouraged coordination
amongst our science graduate programs. Her well-known zeal for
gathering and sharing data, her outreach to departments and centers, and
her gently unambiguous approach, have made the assessment and
improvement of our graduate programs and policies both more transparent
and more successful.
Most recently, Theda has served as chair the Task Force on Teaching and
Career Development, which issued in January a âCompact to Enhance
Teaching and Learning at Harvard.â She also served as a member of the
Harvard University Planning Committee for Science and Engineering. In
these, and many other ways, she has made important contributions to the
Faculty and to the University, as well as to the Graduate School.
I must now, for the benefit of my successor, begin to gather your
thoughts on the challenges and opportunities ahead for the Graduate
School, as well as your confidential suggestions of colleagues who might
succeed Theda as its dean. I trust that youâll write to me in the
coming weeks about these matters.
With my best wishes and thanks,
Yours sincerely,
Jeremy R. Knowles
_______________________________________________________________
34 Responses
3/27/2007 4:06 pm
you did not scoop anyone, check the crimson’s page…
3/27/2007 4:12 pm
Trying to scoop the enterprising Crimson reporters during spring break Richard?
You have to admire their courage publishing articles like these…all from the current front page of the Crimson. Anything similar in SITD lately?
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517924
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517905
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517922
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517904
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517907
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=517914
3/27/2007 4:14 pm
Theda Skocpol may be the first of the Deans appointed by Larry to depart in the coming months…
who would you guess will be next?
3/27/2007 4:16 pm
Ah, I have stirred the hornet’s nest!
In fact, I did scoop the Crimson here, since I checked the Crimson page *after* I posted this item and there was nothing thereânot even the single sentence that it contains as of this writing.
As for anon 2, I have no problem acknowledging the Crimson”s fine work, and I riff off it frequently. (As you so subtly point out.) That’s why it’s such a pleasure when I scoop you guys on something. I only wish that you were as quick to acknowledge others’ scoops as you are to defend your own.
3/27/2007 4:16 pm
you have to admire Jeremy: ‘gently unambiguous’ can you disambiguate that?
BTW, how did TS fare raising funds?
3/27/2007 4:22 pm
Enterprising reporters of the Crimson??? Pllleeezzz.
Look, for example, at their article:
“GSE Losses Spark Petition
The departure in recent years of three Graduate School of Education (GSE) professors who specialized in race relations and civil rights is causing concern and discussion among the schoolâs affiliates about the need for more faculty of color in GSEâs ranks and a greater focus on race in the schoolâs curriculum.”
Is this NEWS? they are talking about events that happened IN RECENT YEARS? and have the nerve to publish this on the front page?
The news about the Departure of the Professor on Civil Law was published on this blog when it was actualy NEWS, some SIX MONTHS AGO.
These aspiring reporters may need to actually get some sleep, rather than publish a newspaper in their sleep.
3/27/2007 4:24 pm
gently unambiguous meant she spoke her mind directly—a very rare quality at Harvard. she’s an excellent dean and it is a loss for the grad school.
3/27/2007 4:24 pm
“Gently unambiguous”=blunt
As for fundraising, I have no idea, though I imagine that fundraising for the GSAS is a nightmare. (I know that I have never given money, for example.) Academics aren’t exactly big donors…..
3/27/2007 4:54 pm
For someone who is a true scholar, a powerful intellect, a remarkable academic, as is Theda, two years as Dean is high service to GSAS.
Let us all thank her for her good work and leadership and look forward to her continued engagement in the intellectual debates of macro political and historical analysis.
She was appointed by Summers but was not typical at all of his appointments. She is the Grande Dame of Deans, a towering intellect. There isn’t a single other appointment made b LHS that gets close to this one.
3/27/2007 5:10 pm
Is it really much of a scoop when the students are on Spring Break and the paper isn’t publishing? That’s as much reason to gloat as a winner of a foot race who had a twenty-yard head start.
3/27/2007 5:13 pm
Do we know she resigned of her own volition? Might this be a house cleaning of Summers/Kirby peope by Knowles to “clean the slate” for his successor?
3/27/2007 5:19 pm
Hey, a scoop’s a scoop, my friend. The Crimson, which prides itself on its professionalism, really doesn’t want to selectively start throwing around that “hey, we’re only students” argument. The precedent could come back to bite you in the ass.
As for whether this is the beginning of a purge….that doesn’t feel right. My sense about Skocpol and GSAS would be, “If it ain’t broke…” Why get rid of her when she’s thought to be doing a good job? (C.f., Steve Hyman.)
3/27/2007 5:48 pm
Hey Richard, I thought this wasn’t a competition!
3/27/2007 5:54 pm
Okay, now I feel bad. Hmmm…in the larger sense, it’s not a competition, because we’re all in it together, but on those rare occasions on which I land scoops, you’ll allow me a few moments in which to gloat?
3/27/2007 5:57 pm
1. Why do you assume that any poster who writes anything in defense of the crimson is a member?
2. “I only wish that you were as quick to acknowledge others’ scoops as you are to defend your own.” Do you have examples of the Crimson’s failure to acknowledge other people’s scoops? Are you just throwing out a baseless accusation? (I can’t tell if you are suggesting that the paper itself fails to credit other papers or reporters, or if your statement was just based on the unsupported assupmtion that anonymous 4:06 represented the crimson).
3. “Hey, a scoop’s a scoop, my friend. The Crimson, which prides itself on its professionalism, really doesn’t want to selectively start throwing around that “hey, we’re only students” argument. The precedent could come back to bite you in the ass.”
What? Again, it’s not going to come back to bite “you,” the crimson, in the ass, because the crimson hasn’t and doesn’t make this argument. An anonymous poster did.
4. I, as it happens, am a former Harvard undergrad and Crimed.
3/27/2007 5:59 pm
P.S. Congratulations on your scoop.
3/27/2007 6:00 pm
Just curious Richard, but how did you find out about this bit of news?
3/27/2007 6:02 pm
Anon 1: Because they usually are. Also, because I find it hard to believe that anyone else would care.
And yes, I reported in 02138 that the Corporation had instituted a review of its presidential-vetting procedures prior to the current choice, and the Crimson reported that without attribution a couple months later.
Anon 2: Thank you! Thank you!
Anon 3: I could tell you, but then….well, you know.
3/27/2007 6:16 pm
“Because they usually are”? Talk about begging the question! You must think that these matters are of broad interest to all your readers, since you bring it up on your blog so frequently.
Even if the crimson did not properly credit you there (though 3 months later may be different than the next day), I think your evidence is underwhelming, esp. since the crimson recently ran a profile of you that talked about how you often scooped harvard news.
Anon 5:57/5:59
3/27/2007 6:19 pm
That’s true, and that was very decent of them….
3/27/2007 6:40 pm
At least the Crimson doesnât plagiarize (or at least it acknowledges when it does).
Javier Hernandez and Daniel Schuker, Feb. 5, 2007:
The University now finds itself in a delicate position. Some committee members have expressed concern that if the panel were to choose Faust so soon after Cechâs public withdrawal, she might she might appear to be a second choice, according to two sources. But if the committee demonstrates a willingness to reopen the search to other candidates, such as Provost Steven E. Hyman and Law School Dean Elena Kagan, it may make it hard to recommend Faust as the clear top choiceâeven if she is currently the committeeâs preferred candidateâthe sources said.
Richard Bradley, March 2007:
Cechâs withdrawal put the Corporation in a delicate position. Drew Faust was now the only candidate, and everyone following the search knew it; if she was not quickly picked, the delay would suggest that the Corporation lacked confidence, perhaps wanted to consider other names. And if the Corporation did choose Faust, but after weeks rather than days, she would be perceived as a pick about whom the governing board was less than enthusiastic.
3/27/2007 6:49 pm
I understand, Richard; it’s not a competition, except when you can claim a victory. I think you should face up to the fact that every time you go off on the Crimson, even a little bit, it distracts your blogging very unhelpfully. You have more important things to talk about; just don’t go there again.
3/27/2007 7:39 pm
Wow! you have really stirred the hornet’s nest at the Crimson this time. The creme of the crop in the staff has been summoned, some of the virtually, and thay are working industriously on a major article on TS. They plan to publish it tonight. They will outdo your reporting of these news this time, you can bet on it!
These are proud people and they are mad at you.
3/27/2007 7:45 pm
Richard, there is something peculiar about your not so subtle competition with the Crimson reporters.
What pleasure can a real writer get out of scooping underage aspiring journalists? Why don’t you instead offer to mentor them, perhaps have them write some pieces that you can edit and help them get published somewhere, and give them constructive criticism more generally?
You need to understand: to the Crimson crowd you are an elder and it is not funny to see you acting as a late-teen.
3/27/2007 7:47 pm
Here’s a thought Richard. Get a section on this blog in which you can log in daily the titles of the stories on the front page of the Crimson. Then you and your readers can give each story a grade. This would help these well meaning but inexperienced writers understand what life is really like for those who don’t live in the ivory tower.
3/27/2007 7:59 pm
Richard,
If it is not obvious to you wake up. Until SITD came on scene The Crimson was the major news of intelligence and gossip about Harvard. Students, alumni, faculty and administrators read it. It was the only way to be ‘in the know’.
The appearance of this blog changed everything. Firs, you now often have people with much insiders knowledge about events at Harvard posting directly on your blog. Two, news happen in real time here. Three, there is a real quality of a forum, of exchange in tihs blog, which the Crimson can’t begin to emulate. You have just become the biggest show in town and they don’t appreciate how this has caused a serious identity crisis for the Crimson. To some between the Gazette and this blog the Crimson is redundant. To others they should be assimilated to the News Office. Others think the Crimson should just be an appendage to the creative writing program.
Don’t take it personally if you get a few little bites from them on your blog from time to time. This is the price of fame.
3/27/2007 8:35 pm
Just to end this debate about who scooped whom: No one scooped anyone. Both RB and the Crimson got this story simultaneously AFTER Jeremy Knowles sent out a letter to the faculty. There were no leaks,no scoops, no sources, just reporting on letter sent out by Knowles to the faculty.
3/27/2007 8:48 pm
5:57/5:59/6:16 and 6:40… that last being a separate, second anonymous poster… Well said.
Richard, I remember when you were reluctant to give the Crimson credit for their much bigger exclusive story-the appointment of Faust herself, on which the Crimson beat everyone, including the Globe, the Times, and you! Now comments like these continue to make you look small.
7:59, I can’t believe you just referred to the Gazette like it’s a real publication. I will grant that SITD has a lively element of discussion that the Crimson does not (and I admire that, even when RB stirs the pot gratuitously), but the Crimson provides more, better and broader coverage of Harvard than SITD, and it has long been a topic of discussion among Harvard affiliates, Crimed and not. That will be the case for a long, long time.
3/27/2007 9:29 pm
https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10810036&postID=6466823986633141032
3/27/2007 9:48 pm
If there is anything more childish and absolutely boring on this blog than the bickering about the Crimson and who scooped what—I don’t know what it is.
3/27/2007 10:33 pm
In response to above post: I know what it is! All postings about Katie Couric’s appearance/ the loves of Tom Brady.
😉 RB staaaarrrrted it….. Seriously, not a bad point, anonymous dude. But I have a sneaking suspicion that RB might possibly do this to get comments! And we wouldn’t want to disappoint
3/27/2007 10:38 pm
Actually, I’m starting to agree with the last poster. What was meant as a jokeâall right, a small jokeâhas become slightly bizarre. The Crimson folks should know that I have a lot of respect for the good work they do, and I certainly depend on it in many waysâthough not, as one poster suggests, for my own diction and thinking.
But I certainly use the Crimson, properly credited, in my research and for blogging material. Do I tweak the Crimson from time to time? Absolutely. They’re serious journalists, they can handle it. I think/hope.
If there’s any truth to one poster’s suggestion that they see me as a mentor, well, then I am flattered. The truth is that I don’t see things that way; I see these journalists as immensely talented and close to professional. That’s why I am sometimes tough on them.
Having said that, the Crimson journalists should know that there if there was ever anything I could help them with professionally, it would be my pleasure. (I did recently get one former Crimsonite work.)
I’ve certainly come to know several of them in New York and Cambridge, andâcliched, but trueâfeel that I learn more from them than the other way around.
So, if I stirred the pot unduly, then I apologize. Truth is, what I said before is really rightâwe are all in this together, just trying to investigate and learn the truth about what happens behind closed doors at Harvard.
3/28/2007 8:14 am
Oh, and Waiting EmuâI give the Crimson credit for being first on Faust. I think the line you’re referring to simply grouped the first newsbreakers together without breaking out the Crimson.
3/28/2007 10:53 am
Hm. I was kind of referring to the whole thread, but in particular a part where you said that being a small amount of time ahead didn’t matter-only the day… Beyond issues of the Crimson vs. whoever, I still don’t agree with this, and am surprised that you, as an advocate of blogging, do. Think about how much an hour means at a wire service!
You wrote: “All right, all right, you guys got it first by however many hours. But in the real world, no one cares.”
To be fair, you were writing about the impact of the story “on other media,” which you went on to point out… But let’s move on, shall we? I want to play guess the dean, and this horse is dead (or at least unconscious).