To Geek or not to Geek?
Posted on January 19th, 2007 in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »
Here’s this from the Duke Chronicle:
When asked if he would ever consider leaving Duke to assume Harvard University’s presidency, President Richard Brodhead had a simple response.
“What a foolish question,” he wrote in an e-mail. “I already have a great job.“
“What a foolish question.” I know Brodhead has made some serious mistakes regarding the rape scandalâfrankly, who could have handled it perfectly?âbut I do like the guy. He’s an eloquent man.
Meanwhile, the Crimson continues its series on presidential prospects with this piece by Stephanie Garlow on Thomas Cech, the president of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
(Incidentally, the Crimson calls him Thomas R. Cech, but it’s impossible to tell whether that’s because he uses his middle initial or whether it’s because the Crimson includes everyone’s middle initialâanother reason why the paper should change that anachronistic and pompous policy. Does “Hanna H. Gray” use the H, or is that just the Crimson? What about “David R. Liu ’94″? A newspaper’s style policy should clarify rather than confuse; this one does the latter. Middle initials should be included when the subjects use them, or when there is another, well-known person with the same first name and surname. Otherwise, it’s not only pointless, it’s introducing an error, actually changing the person’s name. Sorryâit’s a pet peeve.)
There seems no doubt that Cech can run a science complex. But can he overcome his complete lack of Harvard connections? And the fact that he apparently owns only two suits?
Reading between the lines, Garlow’s piece suggests that the Nobel Prize-winner is a bit of a science geek. (Which I use as a descriptive, but not judgmental, term.) Not a huge shock there, given his work.
Still…not to put too fine a point on it, but Harvard just had a geek as president, and there were some serious downsides to that. (Moreover, Derek Bok is showing that not being a geekâi.e., having social skills, being a good listener, being charming, and so on, can really boost one’s leadership ability.)
But then, there are geeks who are socially inept and off-putting, and there are geeks who are kind of sweet and inspiring. Which kind is Cech? Is either really suitable? And will the university really experiment with a lab rat bred in the laboratories of Iowa’s Grinnell College, U-Cal Berkeley, and MIT?
The suspense builds…..
3 Responses
1/19/2007 12:15 pm
“A bit of science geek”????? I don’t think you can get away with using the work “geek” and then say it is not a judgmental term. This strikes me as a rather ungenerous conclusion to reach based on the Crimson article. The man is a Nobel Laureate and runs a highly complex institution. He can buy another suit….that doesn’t mean he needs to acquire a new personality.
1/19/2007 1:37 pm
I share your peeve about middle initials, Richard X. Bradley, but just look at the New York Times, where it’s even Gen.George X. Casey and Gen David Z. Petraeus. It’s always seemed to me an Americanism: British papers don’t do it.
1/19/2007 3:22 pm
Probably the result of the Crimson’s influence on the Times….