The North Carolina state bar has filed an ethics complaint against district attorney Mike Nifong, the man who continues to botch the Duke rape case.

In perhaps the most serious accusation, the bar also said Mr. Nifong had engaged in “dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation” by suggesting to reporters that a condom was used in the alleged attack when he had in his possession a sexual assault examination report that indicated otherwise.

…[Nifong] has also admitted going too far in some of his public comments. In his interview with The Times last week, for example, Mr. Nifong said he was wrong to have described members of the lacrosse team as “a bunch of hooligans.”

Um….well, yes.

Meanwhile, a poster below named the “victim” in the Duke case, so if you believe that her name should be public, take a look; a quick Google search shows that, in effect, her identity is public. There’s even a Wikipedia page on her.…

By the way, that Wikipedia page is fascinating. Reading it, I learned an enormous amount of information that I’d never before seen; it’s enough to make you think even more that Nifong is an incompetent, silly man in way over his head—which makes him dangerous.

It’s remarkable how these voluntary journalists who create Wikipedia have committed an end-around around the mainstream media…. Obviously, you can’t trust everything you read on Wikipedia, but then, you shouldn’t trust the MSM either. And the piece on this woman seems relatively balanced.

It is hard not to emerge from reading about her with the conclusion that she is a sad, troubled, and somewhat pathetic person—but not a rape victim.