In the Globe today, Alex Beam agrees with me that Kaavya Viswanathan may not even have committed the acts of plagiarism for which she is not really taking responsibility.

Beam writes: Here is my cautious prediction: If and when the lawyers get through devouring one another, it will emerge that a staffer at Alloy, ”the creative think tank,” introduced the plagiarism.

Yup. Beam and I cautiously agree. (I suggested the same thing yesterday.) I do wonder if Viswanathan has actually read the author, Megan McCafferty, from whom she claims to have plagiarized.

In other plagiarism news, Steve Ross, publisher of McCafferty’s house, Crown Books, completely rejected Viswanathan’s pseudo-apology.

According to the Globe, the Crimson, and the Times, Ross said: ”We find both the responses of Little, Brown and their author . . . deeply troubling and disingenuous. …Based on the scope and character of the similarities, it is inconceivable that this was a display of youthful innocence or an unconscious or unintentional act.”

Acording to the Times, Ross claims that there are “more than 40 passages in Ms. Viswanathan’s book ‘that contain identical language and/or common scene or dialogue structure from Megan McCafferty’s first two books.'”

40 passages? Viswanathan really is a good internalizer…..