Duke Men and their Stix
Posted on March 30th, 2006 in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
While a poster below chastises either me or Richard Brodhead (I’m not quite sure which) for “NPR-type language,” the situation at Duke gets uglier. Now there is evidence that a woman who happened to pass by the house where the alleged rape allegedly took place also experienced racial abuse, in the form of shouted racial epithets; she was so upset, she called 911 to report it.
There seems to be an awful lot of outrage on campus about what may have happened, including a Take Back the Night March, a flier calling on people involved to “come forward,” and a group called the Concerned Citizens at Duke University, which distributed a statement saying that “the university is cultivating and sustaining a culture of privilege and silence that allows inappropriate behavior to plague the campus.”
An interesting charge; I wonder what the foundation of it is. Duke is certainly a privileged place, a university that sometimes feels more like a country club. But that statement makes it sound as if the cultivation of silence began after the alleged rape…
Meanwhile, Brodhead is clearly trying to walk a line between expressing outrage and prejudging the players. “If you were at a university where the president meted out punishment based on what he reads in the newspaper, it would be a pretty dangerous place,” the Times quotes him as saying.
According to the Duke Chronicle, Brodhead was accosted by a group of students who felt that the university was not taking a hard enough line. “I promise you, you will see this University respond with great and appropriate seriousness once the truth is established,” Brodhead said to the group. “I want this to be resolved as quickly as you do.”
That, too, is interesting: Brodhead is at least trying to turn this sad and tawdry business into a teachable moment. Let’s hope it works.
2 Responses
3/31/2006 6:23 am
Richard,
I think you’re giving Brodhead too much credit and respect than his behaviour deserves.
Of course the president/law should not take any action on the crime before any guilt is established. But that is not the main issue for being critical of Brodhead. Rather, it is failing to take severe action against these lacrosse players on the FACT that they have not assisted the police/Duke is finding out the truth. And are refusing to give any information they have. For THIS, they should be kicked out immediately from Duke. Analogously, someone keeping quiet on cheating in some exam is not doing any illegal, but are liable to be kicked from the uni for their behaviour.
These players should be given a choice: either talk whatever they know with authorities. Otherwise, they get booted out. Again, completely distinct from the law.
4/1/2024 6:34 pm
Kicked out immediately? That seems a bit of a rush to judgment. The school will surely have the power to kick them out further down the line, when there’s more information.
One question: I wonder if Brodhead actually has the power to expel them, or if that’s the prerogative of a particular dean….