Bad Craziness at Duke
Posted on March 29th, 2006 in Uncategorized | 9 Comments »
I’ve long been an admirer of Duke president Dick Brodhead, whom I first met about 20 years ago when I was an undergraduate at Yale. A friend of mine had had an unfortunate experience with the Yale disciplinary committe, on which Brodhead sat, which resulted in his suspension from college for a year. I thought the process had been poorly handled, and said so in the Yale Daily News. This made for a few uncomfortable moments with Brodhead, then an English professor who was affiliated with my residential college, Branford.
But only a few. Brodhead initiated a conversation with me about everything that had happened, and though we agreed to disagree, I appreciated the gesture and thought that he listened respectfully to my perspective.
In later years, Brodhead became the dean of Yale College, and subsequently the president of Duke. Throughout, he’s handled himself with a similar sense of decency and respect for the values of a university.
So my heart goes out to Brodhead now that he’s enmeshed in a hideous controversy at Duke; an African-American woman says that she was raped by three white players of the Duke lacrosse team. (Charlotte Simmons was a terrible book, but perhaps Tom Wolfe did get some things right.)
Brodhead has cancelled the rest of the team’s season, which seems appropriate given the ugly circumstances of what may or may not have happened.
But you have to love the eloquence and fair-mindedness of his statement on the matter.
âIn this painful period of uncertainty, it is clear to me, as it was to the players, that it would be inappropriate to resume the normal schedule of play,â Brodhead said, according to InsideHigherEd.com. âSports have their time and place, but when an issue of this gravity is in question, it is not the time to be playing games.â
And in a statement quoted by the Times, Brodhead said: “While we await the results of the investigation, I remind everyone that under our system of law, people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. One deep value the university is committed to is protecting us all from coercion and assault. An equally central value is that we must not judge each other on the basis of opinion or strong feeling rather than evidence of actual conduct.”
Responding to a question about outraged reactions to the alleged incident, Brodhead said, “How can I be surprised at the outrage? If the things alleged are verified, they’re outrageous.”
It is refreshing to hear simple, honest and direct speech that educates without inflaming. We should expect that from university presidents, but it doesn’t always happen.
9 Responses
3/29/2006 5:27 pm
It is worth pointing out a few things. Nice liberal NPR-type language aside, these boys’ careers (sports and otherwise) have been put under a cloud without any factual determinations at all having been made. Apparently, while some level of harassment seems to have occurred (that’s kind of an accepted job hazard for strippers), the lacrosse players deny that a rape occurred — or at any rate, whatever happened may have involved only 2-3 players. The point is, the woman could be lying; alternatively, the kids could be lying. I’m just not convinced that anyone knows at this point. If, in the end, this is a preemptive strike on moral grounds against what turns out to be mere typical jock/frat behavior, then they should cancel the damn basketball season too (oops-already cancelled), because if you think macho mysogynistic behavior is not rampant in the Duke undergraduate world you’re living in a dream house (made of glass).
3/30/2006 8:56 am
Nice liberal NPR-type language? Seems to me that Brodhead is being fair and plain-spoken at the same time. He’s hardly hanging the players out to dry.
Also, what’s what that line, “some level of harrassment may have occurred”? I’m sure that may be a job hazard for strippers, but I doubt that they accept it as casually as you posit it. Especially when the harassment is allegedly racist in nature.
3/30/2006 11:46 am
In my experience, harassment is a not infrequent aspect of the bachelor party stripper’s worklife (not that I’ve ever indulged, but several have unburdened themselves to me of some pretty interesting stories). Also of note is the fact that they typically work for “extras”, which involves performing sex acts for extra pay, often in a separate private area (such as a bathroom). Finally, the real point is this: this is symptomatic of the mindset of today’s trash/porn/real world/parishilton/materialistic/ultimate fighting/megachurch/ MTV/Ryan Seacrest/Blender/hip hop gangsta/corporate american world that is being foisted on our youth in place of real values.
3/30/2006 3:38 pm
Language matters: yes, these “boys’ careers” (“sports and otherwise”) are under a cloud, and it sounds as if the team will turn the “2-3 players” in. In which case those “kids” may have their lives affected, if they are found guilty. But if so the life of the “stripper” will already have been profoundly affected. Rape does that.
3/30/2006 3:46 pm
Surely you mean “Rape”….?
3/30/2006 5:39 pm
Again, language matters. Note my conditionals: “if . . if” The rape would be predicated on the coming to be of those conditionals, so no quotes needed. Note also that the last sentence does not refer to the rape or “rape” of the “stripper”, just to the general effect of rape, which would presmumably be shared by the woman in question if indeed she was raped.
3/31/2006 12:14 pm
Uh, methinks you’ve indulged in one too many graduate seminars
3/31/2006 12:39 pm
I’ll admit, I’m a bit confused by this thread as well….
3/31/2006 3:05 pm
Catherine McKinnon did not say that all heterosexual sex is rape. “If” she did, she would be a hypocrite.