Marcella Bombardieri has a fascinating piece—and one sure to be a big problem for Larry Summers—in today’s Globe.

Bombardieri got former Harvard graduate school dean Peter Ellison, who resigned the position a year ago, to talk on the record about what it was like to work for Larry Summers. And the answer? Not pretty.

Ellison recounts two damning anecdotes.

The first is the story of a meeting between the two men in which Summers suggested moving some funds from a sociology program to the Kennedy School.

According to Ellison, ”President Summers asked me, didn’t I agree that, in general, economists are smarter than political scientists, and political scientists are smarter than sociologists? To which I laughed nervously and didn’t reply.”

The second story is more damaging still. After a meeting in which Summers undercut Ellison’s authority over a question related to the granting of Ph.D’s, Ellison offered his resignation to Summers. (That’s what you’re supposed to do when you feel you can no longer do your job.) Summers claimed that the incident had been a misunderstanding and promised to send a letter to the meeting participants saying so.

The letter was never sent. And later, at a faculty meeting, Summers was asked if the issue in question had ever been discussed. He lied; he said no.

Some thoughts.

About the second episode…If you look at my Harvard quiz below, you’ll see that this episode isn’t the first time that Summers has reneged upon a promise. I’m sure there are other examples. Freel free to post them.

Nor is it the first time he’s lied. One example that comes to mind: Saying that he didn’t know enough about the Shleifer scandal to have an opinion on it. I’m sure there are other examples; feel free to post them.

I don’t mean to sound flip about this, because these are things that I actually take quite seriously. Harvard has a president who can not be trusted to keep his word and lies. This a big deal, and the Corporation’s ongoing tolerance of it is a mystery to me.

At the boarding school I attended, there were just three cardinal rules: No lying, cheating or stealing. If you broke any one of those rules, you’d soon be attending a different school. You certainly didn’t think you could be president of Harvard.

About the economists being smarter thing…. Well, of course, Summers believes this, and anyone who’s had any dealings with him at all can hear the words coming out of his mouth. It’s actually unfortunate (though understandable) that Ellison didn’t call him on it. Summers might well have backed down. That’s what bullies do, when people stand up to them.

The larger point is, Why make such a statement anyway? It’s deliberately picking a fight. It reminds me of Robert Conrad in those old Energizer commercials. “Go ahead. Knock it off. I dare you.”

(C.f. Harvard Rules, page 147: “The president grew conspicuously more interested in his environment whenever an element of competition was introduced.”)

Forgive me for being crude, but..it’d be hard not to come out of such a meeting thinking to yourself, What an asshole….

I mean, wouldn’t that be the typical human response? Why would Larry Summers not get that?