Harvard in the Books
Posted on November 27th, 2005 in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
In the Globe, Allan Helms reviews Harvard’s Secret Court: The Savage 1920 Purge of Campus Homosexuals, by William Wright.
It’s a fascinating story, involving a secret tribunal that expelled a number of Harvard students for suspected gay activity. But Helms suggests that the telling of it is deeply flawed, including a number of factual mistakes, unattributed quotations, and occasional dips into fictionalization.
(The Crimson review said much the same.)
Concludes Helms, “Wright has been so ill served by his editor that perhaps it’s time for a new purge.”
A couple of points here.
First, Wright shouldn’t need an editor to point out factual mistakes or to tell him that interspersing fact and fiction in a work of history is a bad idea.
But second, as is more and more true in publishing, Wright probably didn’t have much of an editor. Well, let me rephrase; Wright’s editor probably didn’t do much actual editing. His publisher, St. Martin’s Press, is known as a commercial house (as opposed to one with a highbrown reputation).
(St. Martin’s publishes the paperback of American Son, so I don’t say that as a slight; nothing wrong with being commercial.)
But I’ll bet that St. Martin’s was concerned that the publication earlier this year of Harvard Rules and Ross Douthat’s Privilege had tapped out the market for books about Harvard, and consequently made a decision not to put a lot of resources into Wright’s publication. That, and the fact that it’s aimed at a very specific nicheâgay people interested in Harvardâprobably meant that Wright didn’t receive a lot of editorial attention.
And since publishers don’t pay for fact-checkers, Wright would have had to hire someone himself. (I did, for both of my books, and I consider it money well-spent.) It sounds like Wright chose not to.
I don’t say this as a criticism of Wright; it’s tough to write a book about a small subject and have the resources to do it just as you’d like to. At some point, you have to perform a cost-benefit analysis: If I have to spend $2500 on fact-checking, and that’s, say, five percent of my advance after taxes and a 15% agent’s commission, and the fact-checker catches ten small mistakes…is it worth the money?
Rather, I’m suggesting that some of the perceived failings of Wright’s book may reveal telling changes in the publishing business. It’s not easy to sell a book about a small chapter of Harvard history….
One Response
11/28/2005 12:47 am
Harvard in the Globe today:
Sniping at Summers
By Marcella Bombardieri and Sarah Schweitzer, Globe Staff | November 27, 2023
Despite the vociferous debate about Harvard president Larry Summers this year, few prominent alumni have been willing to comment publicly on the president’s trials and tribulations — especially if they are inclined to be at all critical of him. So it was interesting to get a peek into the private opinion of a well-known alumnus in the form of a letter that came our way, dated Nov. 8. The letter was from Tim Wirth, former US senator and representative from Colorado and currently president of the United Nations Foundation. It was addressed to Jamie Houghton, the senior fellow on Harvard’s governing corporation, who also chairs Corning Inc. and sits on other major boards. ”With all your responsibilities — Corning, Exxon-Mobil, The Metropolitan Museum and Harvard — I can’t imagine that you have time for anything else,” Wirth began, ”but I wanted to bring to your attention the enclosed speech by Hunter Rawlings, the president of Cornell.” In his speech last month, Rawlings criticized intelligent design and ”the political movement seeking to inject religion into state policy and our schools.” Wirth, a former member of the Harvard board of overseers, went on to say that ”the times demand this sort of leadership and institutional commitment,” and added that Princeton president Shirley Tilghman had also spoken out on the topic. ”Unhappily, I fear that President Summers is so damaged that a Harvard statement and position might be lost, or might be reported only along with a further recitation of his woes.” Then Wirth cited an open letter to the committee searching for a new corporation member, from 22 current and former department chairs, which called for greater transparency in the running of the university ”to repair the damaged fabric of trust.” Wirth continued: ”Harvard is important to this debate — and so many others — and it is painful to see the university and its potential so weighted down. As you know so well, the world depends on Harvard’s leadership, and has come to expect it.” Wirth did not return a call and Houghton could not be located over the holiday weekend. But John Longbrake, Summers’s spokesman, said the president ”has been speaking to alumni groups about intelligent design, as recently as November 12 at a large gathering in New York City, when he made the same point as Hunter Rawlings did in his fine speech.”