Yesterday morning I took one step into the subway on my way to work when an African-American policewoman politely asked me if some cops could search my bag. This is a post-9/11 thing: You’re allowed to say no, but if you do, you can’t get on the subway.
In the decade since 9/11, not once has anyone asked to search my bag. I’d like to think it’s because of my honest face, but probably it’s because I’m white, and the vast majority of New York stop-and-frisks (thanks, Mayor Bloomberg) are inflicted upon black people.
Stop-and-frisks, if you don’t know, are also a post-9/11 phenomenon, and they are exactly what they sound like: For no reason that they have to provide, New York cops just stop and search you. It’s a staggering violation of civil rights, and it’s almost entirely directed against minorities. In the first three months of 2012, New York City cops stop-and-frisked people 200, 000 times. That is astonishing-200, 000 illegal searches. Almost all of them involved blacks and Latinos.
Funnily enough, this morning the Times reports that a federal judge has widened a class action lawsuit against the New York Police Department. According to the Times, “she was disturbed by the city’s ‘deeply troubling apathy towards New Yorkers’ most fundamental constitutional rights.'”
She’s not the only one. The New York City Police has grown out of control in the past decade, with its cops raping and stealing while searching anyone whose look they don’t particularly like.
So I guess yesterday they were trying to make amends—searching a white man instead of the usual darker-skinned ones. (And I didn’t even get the frisk that is part of the stop and frisk; they just searched my bag.) So violating civil rights is okay as long as you don’t target minorities?
I guess New York cops think they’ll make it up on the volume…