The Globe reports that Harvard’s top cops have been using university money to fill up their university-provided SUVs…when they’re driving to places that have nothing to do with keeping the campus safe. (Like, oh, a Harley-Davidson show.)
Kevin Regan, associate director-chief of the private force, was tracked using his Harvard-issued gas card to fill up a university police vehicle while traveling to a motorcycle rally in South Dakota on a personal trip in 2007, according to two university employees with knowledge of the case.
A photo of Regan, straddling his motorcycle parked in front of his Harvard-issued sport utility vehicle, was posted on a website for law enforcement motorcycle enthusiasts. The photo has since been removed from the site.
And the chief himself, Bud Riley, has been using Harvard money to pay for trips to his weekend house in Vermont. Nice!
It’s kind of an interesting problem, right? What do you do when your top law enforcement officers turn out to be petty thieves?
Someone should ask the cops involved if they believe in the broken windows theory of policing. You know—small crimes lead to bigger ones?
I’m constantly amazed—though I should know better by now—at how little it takes for someone to sell his integrity. In Washington, a campaign contribution of a few grand can get a lobbyist a line in legislation that costs taxpayers hundreds of millions.
Here’s another example: Over the weekend, I saw a car parked on Broadway at 92nd Street with a big sign on the dashboard that said something like “Federal Law Enforcement—Official Business.” It’s what cops do when they don’t want to pay for parking.
The car was parked outside a Le Pain Quotidien. Now, I could be wrong, but somehow I doubt there was bad behavior going on within an overpriced French bakery, unless you count paying $5 for a cappuccino.
And it was a Sunday, when you don’t even have to feed the meters—which cost, by the way, a manageable $1.50 an hour.
So here was a cop, flashing a totem that says, I deserve special trust, privileges and responsibility because of my job…and on the other hand, flashing that totem in order to do something dishonest, even if only in a small way.
Here’s my favorite (but not in a good way) part of the Globe story.
When asked about the allegations last week, Steven Catalano, Harvard police spokesman, replied, “I do not speak to the Globe directly.”
I’ll admit: It is a pet peeve of mine when spokespeople dissemble. And in this case, it’s both unnecessary and incriminating.
Does Mr. Catalano mean to say that he speaks to the Globe indirectly?
In other words, does the spokesman for the Harvard police have a spokesman?
Or does it mean that the police spokesman doesn’t speak to the Globe at all? In which case, why is Harvard paying him?
Either way, Mr. Catalano should know that taking the 5th makes you sound guilty, which is kind of not what you want when you’re talking about cops.
Here’s a tip for press flacks from a reporter: If you can’t say anything, say, “I don’t have the facts now, and I don’t want to tell you something that may prove to be wrong, but as soon as I can tell you something I’ll call you back.” But don’t lie and obfuscate—your bosses have already done enough to damage the image of the Harvard police department without you making it worse….