MoDo and Me LikeThis
Posted on September 15th, 2009 in Uncategorized |
I never thought I’d say it, but Maureen Dowd is exactly right with her important column on Sunday, “Boy Oh Boy,” in which she argues that racism permeates the fervent anti-Obama mentality exhibited by Joe Wilson and Company.
The congressman, we learned, belonged to the Sons of Confederate Veterans, led a 2000 campaign to keep the Confederate flag waving above South Carolina’s state Capitol and denounced as a “smear” the true claim of a black woman that she was the daughter of Strom Thurmond, the ’48 segregationist candidate for president. Wilson clearly did not like being lectured and even rebuked by the brainy black president presiding over the majestic chamber.
…Wilson’s shocking disrespect for the office of the president — no Democrat ever shouted “liar” at W. when he was hawking a fake case for war in Iraq — convinced me: Some people just can’t believe a black man is president and will never accept it.
This feels accurate to me, and you see this denial of the black president manifested in the bizarre anti-”fascism” protests, the crazies toting guns around presidential speeches, even the anti-ACORN fervor.
(Granted, ACORN deserves criticism—the pimp and hooker story is hilarious and depressing at the same time—but since when is a community group worthy of a national obsession?)
It’s no coincidence that Joe Wilson’s unprecedented act of disrespect was directed towards a black man.
I don’t like even thinking about it, but Wilson et al are going to incite someone who’s just marginally more nuts than they are to take a shot at Obama. And when that happens, will they feel guilty—or glad?
9 Responses
9/15/2009 8:43 am
Sure, the majority of the anti-Obama sentiment is the result of racism and has nothing to do with his progressive agenda. If I remember back a year and a half ago, it was Bill Clinton who was the racist. And weren’t you complaining during the general campaign about all the votes Obama was going to lose because of racism? If you want to delude yourself into thinking that the primary force behind anti-Obama sentiment is race, go ahead, but that doesn’t make it so, and probably says more about you than the protestors.
9/15/2009 8:44 am
And as for ACORN being a “national obsession”, has the NY Times even covered this story yet?
9/15/2009 8:49 am
Part of why I feel this way is because the protesters aren’t making any sense. On health care, for example, they’re protesting against things that aren’t even on the table. (Fascism, for example.) They’re marching on Washington to protest big government when the government is actually starting to turn a profit from having saved Wall Street and the public option is dead.
I’m not saying there aren’t other elements at stake—fear of change being a big one—but I think if you had a white guy who looked and sounded like, oh, Ronald Reagan, the reaction would be very different than it has been to the black guy.
Here’s what the Times has done re ACORN:
http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=ACORN&x=0&y=0&type=nyt
I agree, the paper seems like it’s avoiding the story. Lame.
9/15/2009 10:43 am
Yeah, what on earth would make anyone think racism had anything to do with it?
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/gallery/2009/09/hearses-nazi-dogs-and-crucified-liberty-scenes-from-the-912-march.php?img=29
Come on, puh-lease. You’re just ignoring reality if you don’t think racism is a factor. Is it the primary one? Who knows. But it’s very, very real.
9/15/2009 11:37 am
Maureen Dowd is the blind squirrel who has found a nut. But she has no credibility and brings, as always, no evidence for her claim of nutritional value. I ain’t eating that nut. Who knows where’s it’s been?
9/15/2009 3:07 pm
Anon 10:43. I’m not denying that racism exists, nor am I denying that it is a factor in some of the hatred of Obama. But showing a few pictures out of a rally of a hundred thousand people doesn’t really prove anything. My basic point is that Rich is overstating the racial element behind the anti-Obama anger. It’s easy to call out a douchebag like Joe Wilson. It’s quite another to make him the prototypical member of the anti-Obama crowd.
9/15/2009 4:30 pm
Well, puh-lease, what do you make of the fact that Wilson has become the rightwing cause du jour? If he isn’t the prototypical member of the anti-Obama crowd, why have the most visible elements of that crowd embraced him?
9/15/2009 4:35 pm
Second that, puh-lease. Thousand-page bills, particularly on healthcare, are always going to rally the anti-government wings among conservatives. There is certainly racism about - there always will be - but the sort of leaps and linkages being made here seem very sloppy for even an op-ed.
9/16/2009 7:38 am
Anon 4:30. A couple of years back Cindy Sheehan was a media darling. Was she the prototypical member of the anti-Bush crowd?