Why Sarah Palin’s Clothing Matters
Posted on October 24th, 2008 in Uncategorized |
In the end, it’s not the amount of money that the Republican Party spent on Sarah Palin’s clothing that’s truly offensive.
What is most revealing about the fraudulent nature of the Palin choice is on display here in other ways.
First is that the Republicans felt the need to dress Sarah Palin, as if she were, well, a doll, a prop. While they claimed they picked her for her independence, they really chose her because they thought they could control her. For the men surrounding John McCain, Sarah Palin was a mannequin which they could dress and manipulate as they liked—a political blow-up doll.
Which brings me to the second most important thing about the clothing controversy.
The clothing they picked for her emphasized very specific qualities: glamour and sex appeal.
Palin has presented herself as a small-town woman—though apparently she was happy to discard her small-town clothes—a GOP feminist analogue to Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side.
But the clothing choices made for Palin show what a bogus and cynical claim that is.
When the Republican men picked her—and John McCain in particular—they thought of her in the way that powerful Republican Party males tend to think of women: as a sex object. They may not have admitted it to themselves, but consider it this way: If Sarah Palin looked like, say, Rachel Maddow, would John MCain have chosen her in a million years?
The GOP powerbrokers didn’t pick clothes for Palin that emphasized her empathy with voters, or her working-class origins, or her Alaskan toughness, or any other combination of politically appealing qualities.
They picked clothes that made her look hot.
And Palin played along with the fantasy. For her, running for vice-president was really no different than walking on a stage in a bathing suit. She was selling the same things: a nice smile, a good body, the ability to deliver a few words in public, a willingness to do whatever the judges wanted.
So she put on the form-fitting outfits, she let her hair down and shook it out, she put on shoes with three-inch heels that couldn’t have been less practical for the work of campaigning. And on national television, she winked at all the men checking her out. And like all aspiring beauty queens, she reveled in the attention because it made her feel alive, made her feel desired. The whole country is looking at me!
This clothing brouhaha is not just a mini-scandal, then, not just a political gaffe. It’s a meaningful incident because it lays bare the sexist attitudes that the powerful men at the highest levels of the Republican party have about women.
In their heads, they tried to pass her off as a conservative rival to Hillary Clinton, though in grit, intellect, experience and substance, she was clearly no Hillary Clinton.
But another part of their bodies won out.
(Photos from the New York Times)
8 Responses
10/24/2008 9:25 am
Repuglicans have made poor decisions with even worse outcomes in the past 8 years, but focusing so much of this blog on Palin’s wardrobe has been a waste of space. What about the fact that Colin endorsement hasn’t helped as much in the polls, especially with McCain now shrinking the lead? Reality is to sell the political package they sought to maximize all of Palin’s assets. You can make the same argument about Biden and his hair transplants.
As I mentioned earlier, to help put all of this in perspective, why don’t you have one of your Worth writers make a comparison of Palin’s wardrobe costs with Obama, Biden and McCain’s clothing. You might want to throw in Michelle Obama/Cindy McCain (although we’ve gotten a good idea of the cost of her goods) in the mix for good measure. Of course most of us can’t understand/justify spending a $150K on wardrobe. But, we’re not campaigning around the country. However, if we found that her costs were the same / exceeded that of all the candidates and the wives combined — that would be something to write home about.
10/24/2008 9:32 am
One thing we do know, Roark, is that the DNC has not paid for any of Obama’s, Biden’s, or Michelle Obama’s clothing. Which is why we don’t know how much it cost…..
Also: I doubt anyone ever thought the Powell endorsement would make any difference in the polls, certainly not at this point. And Obama’s lead doesn’t seem to be shrinking.
10/24/2008 9:41 am
Happy Birthday, Richard. Hope it’s a good one.
And can you please let this issue about clothing go? Because I don’t think she looks particularly hot. And it makes you sound terrible when you focus on looks. So she’s a pretty woman. You’d be complaining if she didn’t look nice either..
10/24/2008 9:45 am
Thanks for the birthday wishes, Anon. But I have to disagree about the clothing: If you don’t consider these things carefully, then you’re allowing yourself to be manipulated by people who do. Or perhaps you would prefer to live in the Matrix?
http://www.thematrix101.com/matrix/meaning.php
10/24/2008 10:38 am
Happy birthday!
10/24/2008 10:41 am
The most recent speculation and outrage is whether they bought a Louis Vuitton bag not for Sarah Palin, but for Piper, her six year old daughter:
http://deceiver.com/2008/10/22/sarah-palin-real-american-mom/
It’s a striking photograph, in any event.
10/24/2008 12:18 pm
This is a crock, I have to say. First, powerful Republic men — ooh, sends shivers up my spine — don’t have a lock on sexual objectification of women. See Teddy Kennedy. (Well, ok, that was murder, but still…) Second, what’s your basis for claiming that they picked her because she could be controlled. I think you’re using your conclusion as evidence. If you read the forthcoming profile on the McCain campaign, you’ll note that they picked her because, despite a lack of knowledge and experience, she’s really confident and powerful. Third, if you saw the Vogue piece on her as governor, you’d know she’s already learned how to dress swanky. Do you have any pictures of her as a “small town mayor” that prove she didn’t tart herself up back then? She was a beauty queen and TV announcer, for god’s sake — you think she stopped caring about how she looked and then started up again only when the RNC ordered her to?
I think this post highlights an unfortunate tendency to substantiate some of your more outre hypotheses with makeweight evidence. What I pick up is that you yourself have objectified Sarah Palin, along with others. To be sure, she’s definitely selling herself, as are the rest of the candidates in their way. And she’s going with one of her strengths, as they all are. It just so happens that her gender and her sexual presence — as with Obama’s race — makes all of us a little uncomfortable. I for one have no problem analyzing surfaces for what they reveal about the depths below. I just think you haven’t quite hit it yet.
10/24/2008 12:58 pm
I think what no one has mentioned is that maybe the Republican Party might have stepped in to outfit the Palins because their personal wealth is so much less than the other candidates. They needed the financial help and the personal stylists to compete on the national stage, as the others did not.