This Stinks
Posted on April 3rd, 2009 in Uncategorized |
Hold your noses, folks, because this one smells rotten: The president’s top economic adviser, partly responsible for sending tens of billions of dollars to Wall Street banks, made almost eight million dollars in salary and speaking fees last year from those same banks and a hedge fund.
The Washington Post reports……
Lawrence H. Summers, one of President Obama’s top economic advisers, collected roughly $5.2 million in compensation from hedge fund D.E. Shaw over the past year and was paid more than $2.7 million in speaking fees by several troubled Wall Street firms and other organizations.
Here’s the Times:
Mr. Summers’s role at the White House includes advising Mr. Obama on whether — and how — to tighten regulation of hedge funds, which engage in highly sophisticated financial trading that many analysts have said contributed to the economic collapse.
Several Obama aides and advisers made large sums last year from companies whose business could now be affected by their relationship with the federal government, but none made nearly as much, nor with as clear a conflict of interest, as Summers did.
The Post again:
….Financial institutions including JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch paid Summers for speaking appearances in 2008. Fees ranged from $45,000 for a Nov. 12 Merrill Lynch appearance to $135,000 for an April 16 visit to Goldman Sachs…
In addition to his $5.2 million in salary and other compensation from D.E. Shaw, Summers received $586,996 in salary from Harvard University.
Let’s see. That’s basically his presidential salary from 2005, his last full year as president. So starting in January 2008, a year and a half after Summers was fired as president, he’s still being paid his full salary.
Wonder if Harvard will offer deals like that to the union workers, some of whom have been at Harvard for decades, to whom it’s offered early retirement and may yet lay off.
Actually, we already know the answer to that: No.
Back when I wrote a piece for Boston magazine about Summers’ ouster, I put the amount of his golden parachute at “in the seven figures.” After the article came out, official Harvard types pooh-poohed that number. No way, they said. You’re wrong. We can’t tell you what it is, but it’s not that much.
It was that much.
Larry Summers always wanted to make more money than the half million bucks or so he received from Harvard, along with free housing, a full-time chauffeur, business class travel, a huge expense account, and so on (clothing allowance?) that he received as Harvard president. Fine. That’s his prerogative.
The problem is, Can we now believe anything that he has to say when it comes to Wall Street? How can Americans trust this man when he earned from Wall Street in one year a sum comparable to the total he’d made in all the prior years of his career? How grateful he must be!
As Henry Blodget puts it on Business Insider, “No wonder Summers is so eager to save Wall Street.”
Here’s a list, by the way, of the banks, consulting firms and so on who bribed paid Summers. You’ll note, for example, McKinsey & Co., the consulting firm to which Summers threw a lot of business when he was Harvard president.
(…..said Lawrence H. Summers, Harvard’s president, adding that the university brought in consultants from McKinsey & Company to identify categories in which money could be saved.)
Apparently payback isn’t always a bitch. Sometimes it’s $135,000.
(Then again, maybe that $135k was something former Harvard Corporation member/Mckinsey and Co. officer D. Ronald Daniel, who helped choose Summers, threw in to sweeten the pot and get Summers to leave his office quietly.)
One wonders, by the way, what Larry Summers, whose managerial skills dragged a university into the worst chaos and upheaval since Vietnam, had to tell a consulting firm about best practices.
You’ll also note the presence of Goldman Sachs, Bob Rubin’s old firm, and Citigroup…Bob Rubin’s then firm.
Scratchscratchscratchscratch.….
Scratchscratchscratchscratch….
(That’s the sound of two men scratching each other’s back.)
No wonder Barack Obama didn’t want Larry Summers to have to go through a confirmation process…..
For a copy of Larry Summers’ financial disclosure report, go here.
17 Responses
4/3/2024 11:20 pm
This actually shows the “seven-figure” severance deal may well have been wrong — though it may well be right for all I know. Better, as a University Professor, team-teaching a course or so a year in the KSG, LS got (still gets??) a mid-six-figure amount per annum — an even better deal, no?
That’s six librarians right there . . .
4/3/2024 11:28 pm
PS
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/03/AR2009040303910.html?hpid=topnews
4/4/2024 8:28 am
This is a veritable shame on so many counts.
The Harvard Corporation and the Board of Overseers may want to look closely at the reality or appearance of payback. In what ways did any of those firms who treated former President Summers so royally benefit from transactions with Harvard University or with Harvard Management Company?
Harvard’s leadership needs to demonstrate that it is fully committed to the truth and nothing but the truth on this matter.
4/4/2024 9:01 am
“He reported being paid $10,000 for a speaking date at Yale and $90,000 to address an organization of Mexican banks.”
not bad for someone who already once spent massive US taxpayer’s dollars to fund a bailout of Mexican banks. Is this an advance to lubricate a repeat performance?
4/4/2024 12:52 pm
Why do I have to supply my name and address to get a copy of this report from the White House?? You can get it here, from DocStoc without registering.
4/4/2024 1:18 pm
I don’t want to defend most of the actions of the Bush and Obama administrations when it comes to saving Wall Street, but I fail to see the outrage here. What do you expect Summers to do? He is a former treasury secretary who is talking about economic issues to Wall Street bankers after he has left office and they are paying him for it. How is this any different than any other former public official getting paid obscene amounts of money (hello Bill Clinton) to speak to groups about what they are familiar with?
…and who would you have Obama get to try and put Wall Street back together? Someone who has no knowledge of how the economy works or someone who has intimate knowledge of it. Most of those with experience have made vast sums of money from Wall Street so you have the same conflict.
4/4/2024 1:25 pm
Sorry Anon, maybe you don’t see anything wrong with this picture. Perhaps it should also be obvious to the rest of us how a former Harvard President who became President after a career as a public servant and university professor is now a multimillionaire… all while the University he lead is today significantly poorer than he was when he took over.
This is some Midas touch for sure and maybe there is nothing to be outraged, as you say.
4/4/2024 1:27 pm
What could Midas possibly have on the University leadership that the continue to afford him such immunity. Maybe he knows too many dark secrets, or maybe the people he appointed continue to run the University.
4/4/2024 1:36 pm
As intriguing as the issue of conflicts with Summers’ White House role may be, I continue to be fascinated by Summers’ relation to the university and its Corporation. He was certainly keeping busy during 2008, after he had ended his sabbatical (right?) and was back working full-time at Harvard, continuing to pull down a $600K salary. Of course professors are allowed to consult; in FAS the standard is 20%, or roughly a day a week. Summers is a University Professor so I am not sure what standard applies to him; it would be surprising if it were very different from that. But I was not aware that ANY Harvard professor could hold a SALARIED position with another firm simultaneously with his or her full-time commitment to Harvard. So the $1,248,747 SALARY that DE Shaw paid him in 2008 raises my eyebrows. (He also got “distributive share of partnership” from DE Shaw, but the salary is split out as a separate item.) And look at his term-time speaking schedule for last fall: $67K on 9/9; $67.5K on 9/21; #112.5K on 10/2; $225K on 10/3; $135K n 10/7; $103.5K on 10/16; $135K on 10/19; $112.5K on 10/24; $1K on 10/26; $36K on 10/28; $13.5K on 11/6; $67.5K on 11/11; $45K on 11/12 (that’s the one that was donated to charity). There is a whole set of editorships, column-writings, and advisory board memberships in the list as well.
The FAS rules are designed to prevent both conflicts of interest and what are called “conflicts of commitment,” recognizing that professors don’t punch time clocks and that while some outside engagements can be productive for the individual and ultimately benefit the university, there is a point at which these activities distract from the commitment to Harvard and the university gets ripped off. RT, do you think you or I could get away with this term-time schedule?
And remember, this is the man who hauled Cornel West into his office and reamed him out, alleging (falsely) that West skipped classes to work on Bill Bradley’s presidential campaign. And then went on to suggest that since West was a University Professor, he should meet regularly with Summers so Summers could monitor his work. How can Summers have credibility about the morality of executive compensation of the firms he is bailing out when his posture about compensation is so morally relativistic, with one set of expectations when he is the boss and a different set when he is the employee?
Did the Corporation go into whatever deal it struck with Summers with the expectation that Summers could do all this outside Harvard? Does any member of the Corporation have a moment’s twinge of conscience about any of this?
4/4/2024 2:35 pm
That’s the brilliant part of all of this, Harry, and why RB’s seven figure severance info belongs in the back seat. LS set up office in KSG as I understand it, maybe HBS as well (do they have consulting limits?), and the University Professorship allows him to “teach” pretty much anywhere, as I understand it.
I see the White House documentation states the Harvard salary as being for 2008 and 2009, which could of course include just the first 20 days of January 2009. But my question remains, is LS still on the Harvard payroll, as he’s still on various mastheads; i.e. is he as a non-cabinet member officially away or not. Just a thought.
Anon, 1:18, Clinton (for whom I hold no brief, since he was part of the same pillaging and oligarchical putsch we are seeing in action now the tide is out) did it on the back end, LS on the front end (like Cheney at Halliburton), including after Obama’s election. If you can’t see the difference, then I’m sorry. And as for your last question: Stiglitz, Sachs, pretty much anyone else, as is clear from the link Sam Spektor gives in the more recent post:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/04/summers/
4/4/2024 2:44 pm
I believe the forms imply that the stated salary includes 8 days of 2009 (page 21). The implication is that he is off the Harvard payroll as of Jan 9.
4/4/2024 2:47 pm
Thanks, Harry. Good to settle that at least.
4/4/2024 3:52 pm
Didn’t Larry say that he would be writing a book after the Presidency? Where is that now? A good title might be ‘If Harvard turns you down for college don’t worry, just make them pay and laugh all the way to the bank’.
Have you heard the last joke in the undergraduate dinning rooms? ‘What do Russia, Harvard and a pile of cow maneure have in common?’
4/4/2024 4:07 pm
I can’t get out of my mind what Summers said when he was deposed in the Shleifer case. When asked if he didn’t think there was an improper conflict of interest between Shleifer’s role as a Harvard-HIID advisor to Russian on how capitalism should work, and Shleifer’s role as a private person investing in the very same businesses, Summers said that under “Russian mores and Russian practices,” the Russians “would have, in part, valued advisers more extensively if they were more involved in actual private sector activities.” I’m sure Summers now feels that his private sector experiences have given him expertise on the “mores and practices” of Wall Street that should make Americans profoundly grateful that he has chosen to lend his economic wisdom to the country.
4/5/2024 10:02 am
Isn’t this scandal a sufficient reason for Harvard’s Provost or President to call Professor Summers and ask him what he has been up to lately? or would they rather convey to Harvard’s students that there is no reason for concern in the publicity a member of the academic community is receiving regarding potential conflicts of interest with his obligations to that academic community?
4/8/2024 1:44 am
“The Harvard Boys Do Russia” (The Nation, 1998):
http://www.thenation.com/doc/19980601/wedel
4/8/2024 2:00 am
A pretty good summary of Summers’ accomplishments:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers