Shots In The Dark
Wednesday, March 12, 2024
  Some Thoughts on Mr. Spitzer
Last night I started wondering whether, in the matter of Eliot Spitzer, we weren't all repeating the rush-to-moral-judgment mistakes of the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

The questions, after all, felt so familiar. How could Silda have stood alongside him like that? How could a politician be so reckless, so arrogant? What could make a man in that position risk everything? What a bastard Eliot Spitzer must be....

As someone who was, at the time, pretty moralistic about Bill Clinton, then later came to regret that attitude, I wish we could remember some of the moral nuances that the country eventually arrived at, some of the insights about the connections between political success and personal desires.

How could Silda have stood alongside her cad of a husand? How could Eliot have cheated on her?

Well, who are we to say what goes on inside a marriage? Even as all the pundits tut-tut at Silda for standing by her man, unless we are privy to the inner life of Eliot Spitzer and Silda Wall, we simply can not judge. (And why is the impulse to judge apparently so much more powerful than the impulse to try to understand?)

As for Spitzer's carnal desires....well, this is a man who's clearly hugely ambitious, energetic, and driven. Is it so impossible that, as with JFK and Bill Clinton, men who embody these characteristics often find that they carry a proportionate amount of sexual desire inside them?

And isn't it possible, in a way, that we should want this from our leaders, because if they don't have that passion inside them, maybe they shouldn't be running one of the biggest states in the country?

I'm not saying there aren't plenty of better options, or that this is a simple black-and-white matter. On the contrary: I'm saying that maybe we need to calm down, take a deep breath, before we have this guy tried and convicted in the court of public opinion.

Now, please don't misunderstand me: I'm not sanctioning adultery, nor the use of prostitutes, particularly because governors shouldn't commit crimes, no matter how minor.

(Prostitution, so far as I can tell, only hurts people when it's illegal. And frankly, if I were a woman and you gave me a choice between, say, working in a coal mine or hooking at $5k an hour—extreme choice, I know, but you take the point—I might just take the $5k. I certainly wouldn't criticize those who did.)

(Second point: Shouldn't everyone who believes in abortion rights support legalized prostitution? How can one believe that you have the right to abort a fetus but not the right to sell your body for sex?)

What I am saying is that we shouldn't entirely judge Eliot Spitzer because of the way he treated his wife and kids. (The Times reports that she is actually urging him not to resign!) We should primarily consider him in terms of how good a governor he's been.

(Unfortunately, the answer to that is, not very good. But then, he was a pretty great state attorney general, and he was apparently visiting prostitutes at the time then, so there doesn't seem to be any negative correlation between Spitzer's sex life and his job performance.)

I'll cede that moral leadership is part of public life, and that it's important. But it isn't everything. There are plenty of great leaders who are personal hypocrites. Martin Luther King cheated on his wife, but we all think of him as a great man, and we are right to do so.

So Eliot Spitzer has socially and maritally inappropriate sexual desires. That isn't great.

But so did Bill Clinton. And while his successor, George W. Bush, doesn't seem to have that personal failing, which one would you prefer as president?
 
Comments:
Well done Crimson. Here's an intelligent article on this tragic story. I'm glad to know at least some of the reporters for the Crimson understand integrity.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=522466
 
why why why (rhetorical) is it worse to cheat on your wife, or have sex with prostitutes, then it is to invade a foreign country, kill hundreds of thousands of people, and commit war crimes?
 
Excellent point, grumpygirl...

lmpaulsen
 
It's none of my business whether Eliot Spitzer cheats on his wife. But it's depressing that a self-righteous prosecutor turns out to commit crimes. If he doesn't think prostitution should be illegal, then that's another story. But it is depressing when outspoken prosecutors think themselves above the law.
 
Why can't we expect people to not only do their jobs to their capacity and live like civilized human beings. People don't loathe him so much for what he did, it is more the irony that he championed against this type of smut. One last note, if he were a Republican, do you think he would have been referred to in the press as "Republican Gov. Spitzer" versus just "Gov. Spitzer"? Hmmm?
 
Hundreds of thousands, huh, grumpygirl? I realize that hyperbolic language has its place in an anti-war movement, but (unfortunately) there is a difference between, say, 50K dead Iraqi civilians (the ones on us) and hundreds of thousands - it's simply a different level of terrible. The difference matters (again, unfortunately). I know where you first heard that number, and it was hugely debunked. Irresponsible to keep citing a grossly inaccurate study. And we wonder why liberals don't have foreign policy credibility...
 
9:55am, your blithe assurances show why people loath lying warmongers.

I don't want to get into the weeds of the Lancet study debate, which I assume you're referring to do, but it's hardly unfair for grumpygirl to count people who died as a direct effect of the war, even if they weren't shot. Nevermind all the lives that could have been saved if the billions spent on war had been spent on health care, etc, etc.
 
gosh, i'm sorry... since it's not hundreds of thousands, but less than 100k (and that's only the ones we know about), then it must be far better more moral than hanging out with prostitutes

are you f'ing kidding me?
 
and, anonymous 9:55, why not show who you are instead of hiding behind those stats and a nom de plume of sorts
 
Truth has so many names, how does one choose? But you, my dear, can call me "grumpytruth."
 
how philosophical and esoteric.

perception is reality, everyone has their own version of truth. somehow, i doubt our elected officials can handle the truth
 
I love that phrase "big passion". I guess that's kind of like "big love". Or maybe "big dick"?
 
Or more likely, "tiny dick".
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 / 7/1/07 - 8/1/07 / 8/1/07 - 9/1/07 / 9/1/07 - 10/1/07 / 10/1/07 - 11/1/07 / 11/1/07 - 12/1/07 / 12/1/07 - 1/1/08 / 1/1/08 - 2/1/08 / 2/1/08 - 3/1/08 / 3/1/08 - 4/1/08 /


Powered by Blogger