Shots In The Dark
Wednesday, August 15, 2024
  Toxic Toys
Mattel is recalling 19,000,000 of them—all made in China.

(By the way, for a massive recall, the Mattel site is pretty darn quiet about it—try to find the announcement of the recall on their site. Then look at the two-page single-spaced press release, and think about how useful that's going to be for most people. Way to handle the situation, Mattel.)

This is going to start a wave of toy recalls; Mattel is surely not the only one.

In other China news, they've been exporting baby bibs made with lead.

Meanwhile, the number of "super-rich" in China is growing exponentially.

Let me clarify something: A couple of you have wondered if I have something against China. Not so. But China's newfound international power creates a historically unique and alarming situation: The rise of a superpower in a globalized age which also happens to be the world's most populous nation—but, in part due to its undemocratic system of government, lacks the regulatory infrastructure to monitor the safety of its exports or tamp down the excesses of its imports, such as shark fins. The consequences are being felt around the world—from the development of impoverished African nations, pollution of the entire world*, possibly sick children in the US and elsewhere, extinction of sharks around the world, and countless other ways.

And these phenomena stemming from China's massive impact on the world are also happening extremely fast—sharks, , for example, could be extinct within five to ten years.

So we're at a fascinating moment here, and it seems worth paying attention to—and yes, on occasion, raising an alarm about.
________________________________________________________________

From the New York Times:
Unless China finds a way to clean up its coal plants and the thousands of factories that burn coal, pollution will soar both at home and abroad. The increase in global-warming gases from China's coal use will probably exceed that for all industrialized countries combined over the next 25 years, surpassing by five times the reduction in such emissions that the Kyoto Protocol seeks.
 
Comments:
Gee, that's strange. I went to the site, looked under media and there it all is, with a big red headline that says RECALL INFORMATION and then six links to press releases. Couldn't be easier to find.
 
Well, Sam, this is subjective, but given the scope of the recall, I'd suggest that's minimal. And I'd bet a lot of parents would agree.
 
As a parent of a 3 yr old I agree, I am afraid they are going to have to start enclosing postcards with toys like they do with car seats , so you can register with the manufacturer and be notified of a recall, too bad. There are still toys made in China on the shelf in Target that are not part of the recall (Dora,etc.) They may need to label these, ("NOT PART OF 2007 RECALL") in order for them to sell.
 
At the moment, I wouldn't buy *any* toy made in China. Because how long would it be until the next recall?
 
Love it. You live in New York and eat in restaurants that are probably serving you copious amounts of dead roach mixed with rat feces on a day-in/day-out basis yet you pretend to be interested in tainted toys because of your concern for the welfare of American children. Admit it: you're humping the Chinese because it's a provocative story that will drive traffic through the site. Kind of like the way Lindsay Lohan et al dominate the celeb sites and tabloids.

Sure, this is a real story, particularly at the governmental and global macroeconomic levels. But what you're focusing on are naturally the gritty human interest stories that, provided in bulk and without any real attempt at context, add up to what one of your readers summarized thusly: China is a "strange backward country and I wouldn't want to go there."

Try having some editorial integrity before you deny that you have something against the Chinese.
 
Oh, don't be silly. I don't particularly care about driving traffic to the site. It's not as if I make any money off this. I just write about things that interest me, and if they interest others, that's great.

These stories about China are threads that are, of course, part of a larger tale. Someone with more time and more information about China than I can put them together. I assume that the folks who read this blog are intelligent and thoughtful enough to create contexts of their won through which to interpret this information. Think of it as laying down instrumental tracks on Garageband, then letting other users put the tracks together in any way you want. You're welcome to comment, to suggest links to other articles, and so on. Let a hundred flowers bloom, right?
 
Nice sashay, as usual. You could have summarized all that in a single sentence: "Who, me?"
 
This isn't about China per se, it's about global capitalism. When monetary profit takes precedence over all other considerations, then people are likely to be put at greater risk whether it's toys, health care, infrastructure maintenance, mining, food, climate change, etc.
 
No, this is most certainly about China. When 9 out of 10 of these export scares arises from China, it's too soft to see it as a broader issue of global capitalism.

In short: it's China, stupid.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 / 7/1/07 - 8/1/07 / 8/1/07 - 9/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger