Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, August 14, 2024
  The Presidents, Two Styles
Here's Lee Bollinger's statement on the anti-Israeli boycott:


"As a citizen, I am profoundly disturbed by the recent vote by Britain's
new University and College Union to advance a boycott against Israeli academic
institutions. As a university professor and president, I find this idea
utterly antithetical to the fundamental values of the academy, where we will
not hold intellectual exchange hostage to the political disagreements of the
moment. In seeking to quarantine Israeli universities and scholars this vote
threatens every university committed to fostering scholarly and cultural
exchanges that lead to enlightenment, empathy, and a much-needed international
marketplace of ideas.


"At Columbia I am proud to say that we embrace Israeli scholars and
universities that the UCU is now all too eager to isolate -- as we embrace
scholars from many countries regardless of divergent views on their
government's policies. Therefore, if the British UCU is intent on pursuing its
deeply misguided policy, then it should add Columbia to its boycott list, for
we do not intend to draw distinctions between our mission and that of the
universities you are seeking to punish. Boycott us, then, for we gladly stand
together with our many colleagues in British, American and Israeli
universities against such intellectually shoddy and politically biased
attempts to hijack the central mission of higher education."

And here's Drew Faust's (with apologies for the formatting;

not sure what's going on there):


Earlier this summer the University and College Union (UCU), an
organization of British academics, proposed a boycott of Israeli
universities and academics, a proposal to be voted on by their
membership in the coming months. On my second day as President, July 2,
I wrote directly to Sally Hunt, the First General Secretary (president)
of the UCU, stating my strong opposition to this measure. I expressed
my conviction that such a move subverts the academic values and
freedoms necessary to the free flow of ideas that are the lifeblood of
universities and, ultimately, that of the societies and world we serve.
To be clear, my own view is that academics should be promoting, not
undermining, the fullest possible collaboration with Israeli
universities as well as other universities in the Middle East and
elsewhere.


Finally, while I am most comfortable expressing my views on such matters directly in my own words as opposed to signing group statements or petitions, I obviously join many colleagues throughout the international academic community in denouncing unequivocally an action that would serve no purpose and would fundamentally violate the academic freedoms we must defend at all costs.

Without making any judgments, there are interesting differences between the two. Bollinger's is more hortatory, more dramatic, more impassioned, and some might say more self-aggrandizing; Faust's is certainly more low-key, perhaps even a bit bland. That's not always a bad thing in such matters, however.

Which, I wonder—and I do not mean this as a rhetorical question—would have a greater impact, Bollinger's public call-to-arms or Faust's quiet declaration?


 
Comments:
There is no boycott. Bollinger, along with many others, appears to have completely misunbderstood the situation
 
Bollinger's a lawyer. That's the difference. Re effect, who knows.
 
Bollinger's "Boycott us" shows lack of thought. If the point is that boycotts are wrong because they violate academic freedom, then you should not be proposing, even rhetorically, a boycott against yourself. Passion is good, but not when outruns reason.
 
What is the real issue here? What are the Brits saying and why are we opposed to hit- plain English please- not an academic so keep it short simple and accurate, thank you.
 
Both statements have problems. Faust's, however, is too self-involved and self-justifying, and it shows little flair for articulating fundamental university and democratic values with vivid clarity.
 
Three presidents, three styles.
 
Why hasn't Amy Gutman issued a statement on this issue? She's clearly thought much about the topic.
 
Elena Kagan and other Harvard Deans are pondering whether to express their views on this subject.
 
Bollinger, Bollinger.. the fellow who could have been Harvard President. One wonders what Rubin and Gray are now thinking about their own actions to advance another candidate to the position.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 / 7/1/07 - 8/1/07 / 8/1/07 - 9/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger