Shots In The Dark
Friday, June 08, 2024
  The GOP's Shrinking Future
Two pieces in the Times today suggest that the Republican Party is so enslaved to its bigotry that it'd rather commit political suicide than abandon old biases.

The first news, of course, is that Republicans in the Senate killed the immigration bill, and now resolving the immigration problem has been put off indefinitely. American Latinos will get the message: the GOP just doesn't want them here. Though there are plenty of reasons why this largely religious, socially conservative group of immigrants could gravitate toward the Republicans, the GOP seems determined to push them away. It's political suicide.

The second issue is the continuing division between the two parties on "don't ask, don't tell." Democrats are repudiating it; Republicans continue to endorse discrimination against gays in the military. John McCain says that reconsidering the issue would be a "terrific mistake." Rudy Giuliani, who surely knows better—who shared an apartment with two gay men after he cheated on his wife and left her—says that "at a time of war, you don't make fundamental changes like this." This despite polls saying that a majority of men and women in the military no longer care, not to mention a severe shortage of soldiers. In any case, the supposition presupposes a logic that it does not contain. Why not make fundamental changes in a time of war? We've made fundamental changes in other means of conducting the war—the "surge," for instance. Why not this one?

Imagine a conservative who wasn't a bigot but advocated fiscal and foreign policy caution—he or she would be a very powerful candidate. But perhaps those primary voters just won't accept such a trailblazer.

In other Republican news, Alaska senator Ted Stevens turns out probably to be a crook. No surprise there, but...good! For four decades in the Senate, Stevens has done nothing but funnel pork barrel dollars to his home state and agitate against every pro-environment measure to come before that body. Stevens is, simply, an awful senator, and anything that could get him out of office is a good thing.
 
Comments:
The surge was not a fundamental shift in the waging of the war, at ALL.

I mean, are you serious?

The other problem that the Republican Party has, besides not attracting Latino voters, is that it has presided over the most morally catastrophic five years in American history.
 
Re: Stevens:

My nominee for the greatest SINGLE moment -- and I mean like nanosecond -- ever to occur on the floor of the Senate occurs at PRECISELY 4:47 on this great great clip.

Watch the whole thing.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=RmY1g9dAfx8

SE


PS. Did I say 'morally catastrophic'? I should have included about eleven other important adverbs.
 
This sentence is really sticking in my craw for some reason.

"We've made fundamental changes in other means of conducting the war."

It's just false.

Our only opportunity to do anything fundamental (and therefore potentially consequential) was November 2, 2004.

A day in my top five of most tragic single days in U.S. history.

Standing Eagle


Off the top of my head: anyone want to play this parlor game? --

three minutes on Wikipedia --

9/17/1862 -- 23,000 casualties at Antietam

9/11/2023 -- Terrorism causes terror

5/28/1830 -- Andrew Jackson signs Indian Removal Act

11/10/2024 -- last vestiges of Reconstruction Republicanism swept out with loss of 96 seats in Congress

11/02/2024 -- Voters ratify Bush geopolitical agenda

What did I forget?


Strong cases can be made for the tragic character of stuff that just did not have to happen -- Theresa LePore's butterfly ballot, John Wilkes Booth's bizarrely easy assassination of the greatest American -- but the above list seems to me to have more nobility and Weltgeschichtlichkeit.

So to speak.

Anyone want to plump for the Battle of Manila Bay? The RFK assassination? Taft-Hartley?

SE
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger