Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, June 12, 2024
  The Genius of the Sopranos
The Washington Post reports that Sopranos fans are furious about the way the show ended.

So many angry "Sopranos" fans tried to register their complaints on HBO's Web site, the channel shut it down temporarily Sunday night.

...A bunch, who were way mad at the way Chase had messed with them in the finale, started messing with his
Wikipedia entry, adding lines such as: "[Chase] gained mainstream recognition for creating and then destroying the HBO series 'The Sopranos' which is currently being debated as the worst ending to an American Television series in history."

Finally, the brain trust at Wikipedia locked the page from further "editing" until June 18, citing "vandalism."

Are they nuts? I'm surprised at this reaction to the brilliantly ambiguous ending. What did they expect, that creator David Chase was going to take all the plots and subplots of the most ambitious show on television and wrap them up all in a little bundle to take home on DVD? It just isn't possible.

Here's my take on the ending, which featured Tony and his family sitting in a diner as various suspicious characters move about. From the camera work and the intercutting of perspectives—it reminded me of the editing of the toy store scene in which Bobby got killed the week before— it appears that Tony is on the verge of being whacked. But then, the screen abruptly goes dark for eleven seconds, after which the credits roll.

A friend of mine is convinced that this means Tony did, in fact, get killed—that the sudden darkness was a representation of unexpected and sudden death. Maybe. But I have a different theory: I think it's the projection of a blank slate. (A blackboard, if you will.) It's David Chase saying, You folks have been predicting endings for months now, go ahead—project your own onto the screen.

And of course Americans are furious because we are pathetic, passive creatures who want to be spoon-fed our entertainment.

For what it's worth, here's my take on the last scene: It represented Tony's future, a future in which everyone and everything is a potential threat. (And given the last episode's commentary on Bush, terror and Iraq, mightn't Chase be saying that this is, in fact, the United States' future?)

Tony is with his family in a diner booth—a cordoned-off area, but still vulnerable—trying to enjoy the simple pleasure of family. But, as always, the imperatives of his other family constantly intrude. The threat of law enforcement; the threat of murder; the possibility of betrayal. The space in which Tony can enjoy his family has shrunk, become so small that the four Sopranos are literally squeezed together. Really for the first time, there's the sense that Tony's wife and children might also be in danger.

Tony may be shot by the man emerging from the bathroom. It's possible. More likely, I think, Chase is suggesting that this scenario of tightening pressure and shrinking pleasure defines Tony's future. We don't need to see it, because we can imagine it; Chase has given us all the information we need for that.

One of the most interesting themes of the Sopranos was that you can't leave the Mob voluntarily. (And how weirdly that theme began to echo Chase's own relationship to his creation.) Once you're in, you're in, until you either go to jail or die, usually violently. I thought that this last episode illustrated that theme wonderfully. Note Paulie's attempt to turn down a new responsibility; he wants to get out before he gets killed. But Tony knows just how to push his buttons, and with a sigh, Paulie concedes. There is no getting out.

This is true too with Uncle Junior, who may have, in a sense, escaped by losing his mind. But Tony, with his inimitable cruelty, reminds him: You and my father used to run north Jersey. You were a gangster, you are a gangster, you will always be a gangster. And if your memory ever returns, you have a gangster's responsibility, still: Give your stash of ill-gotten gains to the children of a murdered man.

There is no escape.

So let us give Chase credit for mining his themes with depth and consistency, and consider how this theme would apply to Tony himself. The Sopranos gave us plenty of examples of the fate of Mafia chieftains. They die badly. We don't need a neat and tidy ending to know that. Far preferable is the way that Chase continued to challenge us with his blank screen. He's been pushing us all along to engage with his characters and their nuances and the realities of life, which sometimes has loose ends. (The Russian!) Now, he's saying, this has been my responsibility for eight years. Now, it's your turn. You take the responsibility. You write the script.

The song playing in that scene is more evidence of that interpretation. It is, of course, by Journey, which is certainly what the Sopranos was for both its characters and its audience. It's called "Don't Stop Believing," and not only is it perfectly consistent with Tony's musical taste, it's loaded with suggestion.

Payin anything to roll the dice,
Just one more time
Some will win, some will lose
Some were born to sing the blues
Oh, the movie never ends
It goes on and on and on and on

Perfect, no? And then Chase cuts it abruptly short as singer Steve Perry utters the imprecation, "Don't stop." Boom. Black screen.

Don't stop, meaning what? Is Chase telling us to keep imagining, to continue the show in our own minds? Is he tweaking our desire to have the Sopranos continue forever? Is he making a statement on how we live life in defiance of mortality, plugging (heh-heh) away despite the fate that befalls us all? Pick the answer you want, or suggest one of your own. But appreciate Chase for his brilliance: This is one small detail in an hour-long show, and it alone provides more food for thought than a full episode of anything else on TV.

We have been conditioned by movies and half-hour sitcoms and hour-long dramas to think that everything has a neat and tidy ending. (It's happy! It's sad!)

It ain't so, of course. We owe Chase thanks for reminding us of that truth of that, and for not betraying the wonderful subtlety and nuance of his show in its last episode. Because, you see, by not telling us what happened, Chase did not, in fact, end the show. He gave us those eleven seconds of blank screen, time enough for our minds to ask questions, form memories, suggest possibilities—to wonder and imagine. Isn't an ellipse better than a period? Or, if not better, isn't it truer?

What happens to Tony Soprano after our screens go blank? The answer is up to us, and what a generous gift that is.
 
Comments:
Excellent interpretation, Richard. I was and continue to be delighted at the ending. Best open closure since Virgil's Aeneid. You didn't mention the great Dylan verse from "It's Alright, Ma (I'm only bleeding)" as A.J.'s SUV blows up. Its last line works pretty well with the whole episode:

But it's alright, Ma, it's life, and life only.

Excellent point on the lyrics of Journey's song. Don't you agree that the lines

Some will win, some will lose
Some were born to sing the blues

have an intertext in these from Warren Zevon's Mutineer, a song Dylan has covered since 2003 while Zevon lay dying

I was born to rock the boat
Some may sink but we will float

Anyway, great post. RFT
 
Richard--I don't know Dylan nearly as well as you, so I wouldn't have made the connection. But Chase would make the connection, so, sure, why not?
 
I think another theme in the episode that few have noticed is the whole American vs. outsider.

Here is Tony eating with his family in the most American of restaurants, a diner. (In almost every other dining scene through the series they are at an Italian restaurant.) He's surrounded by iconic American figures -- the trucker with the USA cap -- and yet it also the melting pot -- here are the young African American kids, and here are the Sopranos. As Italian Americans, they feel like outsiders (something alluded to earlier in the episode where Tony is eating dinner with Meadow and she talks about how she wanted to be a lawyer because of "the whole Italian thing").

And yet what does he feel -- paranoia, as he nervously watches everyone else in the restaurant. Fear for the future, knowing that he is most likely about to be arrested. And yet some comfort, because he's surrounded by his family and their relationship is as good as you could hope.

Paranoia, fear, with a dash of hope (don't stop believing!). It captures in a moment the state of our country today.
 
The ending was intriquing, but disappointing ultimately. I thought it was too meta, too self referential, too post-modern. All the Godfather references (obviously the potential shooter going to the bathroom a la the scene where Michael kills Solazo in Godfather I, but people have missed the fact that the cat and Paulie is a reference to Michael death in Godfather III) but also all the references that seemed to be blatantly addressed to the question "how will he end the show."
 
Compare the ending of the Sopranos to how The Wire ends its seasons, where everything is ambiguous, but you know what happened. Ambiguity can be accomplished with clarity. Another reason why The Wire has always been the best show on HBO and therefore the best show in TV.
 
I agree with most of what you've posted here, Rich, and well put. But I can't give Chase quite so much credit as you, because this sort of ending has been done many times before, and I still must admit that it's exactly the sort of ending I was fearing through the entire episode (even if I know deep down that the show is perhaps better for it).

But I think one could also make the argument that it was not any more of an open-ended closure than most endings. He didn't have a gun to his head. He talked about possible indictments coming down from the grand jury. He was simply still alive. So the ending is Tony winning, for the moment. He wins until he loses, but he's still winning when we leave him. While I don't give Chase as much credit for the ending as you do, I still say well done. And the totality of the entire series still puts him far above the rest, even in the film world.
 
Pretty smart post, Richard, though repetitive.

Many wonderful novels end this way, in a crystallized moment. Consider Henry James's _The Ambassadors_ for example, last sentence or two.

I tend to think it's a mistake to dwell too much on what 'the viewer' is supposed to do next. When you focus on where Tony is and how many vectors point through that moment in different directions, you do better. If readers are being somehow 'invited' to become the author -- well, then we're watching American Idol. And Tony is no idol.

Looking forward to catching up on the show this summer.

Will be back next week.

SE
 
Standing Eagle,

High praise from someone who hasn't seen the show! ;-)

RB
 
I never saw the Sopranos (well, two episodes six years ago), but I feel like I have. How about this for an alternate ending:

Tony steps outside the diner. Breathes deeply, staggers, falls. (He's having a heart attack.) Ambulances and sirens; he's taken away (we don't know if he's dead, dying or will recover). Fade to black.

Perfect, eh?
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger