Shots In The Dark
Saturday, June 23, 2024
  Journalism at the Globe
Want to know how (some) journalism works?

The Boston Globe today has an item on me taking a job at 02138. For no apparent reason—I stress "apparent"—it's kinda bitchy.

Here it is:

Yale grad takes reins at 02138
Wait, a magazine devoted to all things Harvard has hired a Yalie as editor? Apparently. The fledgling glossy 02138, which likes to describe itself as a "lifestyle magazine for educated, affluent, and influential readers" -- i.e. Harvard alums -- has put Richard Bradley in charge. Bradley, whose birth name is actually Richard Blow, is the author of "American Son: A Portrait of John F. Kennedy, Jr.," a book that sold remarkably well considering how badly trashed it was by many critics. He also wrote "Harvard Rules: Lawrence Summers and the Battle for the World's Most Powerful University." Bradley didn't respond to an e - mail yesterday.

Hmmm. Let's look at that last line, shall we? "Bradley didn't respond to an e-mail yesterday."

Actually, that's not true. The writer, Mark Shanahan, e-mailed my website e-mail, which goes to my home computer. He e-mailed me at 2:25—not a lot of time for me to get back to him. I didn't receive his e-mail until I got home from work, at which point—7:19, to be exact—I wrote back and called the phone number his e-mail included. (For some strange reason, I haven't heard back from him.)

Shanahan could, in fact, have picked up the phone and called the 02138 office. That's something reporters frequently do.

But even considering that I didn't get back to him before his deadline, Shanahan's item is snarky. The magazine "likes to describe itself as...." I'm a Yale grad! (Harvard too, but never mind.) I changed my name! (Zzzzzz....) American Son "sold remarkably well considering how badly trashed it was by many critics." ("Badly trashed?" Copy editor, please.)

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln.....

What did I do to deserve that litany of faint praise? Shanahan's e-mail to me, printed below in its entirety, may provide a clue:

hey there, since the flacks for 02138 do such a lousy job, thought i'd
email you directly. want to drop a line into the paper about your new gig.
got a minute?

I've never spoken with Mark Shanahan before in my life. There's no greeting other than "hey there"—what are we, 12?—no sign-off, and, as you can see, punctuation is casual. Well, what the heck, it's not that important in a newspaper anyway.

But the real message of that e-mail is, the PR folks for 02138 first told the New York Post about my new job, not the Globe, which doesn't have a media column. Therefore, payback.

Mark, for what it's worth, 02138 has contacted the Globe a number of times in the past, but the paper has never been clear about to whom to send items of possible interest, which is one reason why we went to the Post. Another is that the Globe doesn't cover the media very much or very well. And a third is that Keith Kelly, the Post's media columnist, is probably the most influential media writer in New York, and so it just makes sense to go to him first.

If you guys beefed up your coverage of the media business, well, that would be different, wouldn't it? But don't get mad at me for a decision that is entirely professional.
 
Comments:
Wow -- what a revealingly unprofessional e-mail from that guy.

Good anecdote, Richard.

SE
 
I agree with SE. Richard, forward that e-mail to his Globe editor, perhaps with the suggestion that he be given Shipley's book on proper e-mailing conduct.
 
Richard,

It is the @#%^ Boston Globe...please don't expect any professionalism from them!

Good luck. Who knows you may inspire the Globe to improve its standards...perhaps it is worth a challenge to them, eh?
 
Jesus Richard. You're getting worked up over something in The Boston Globe's gossip column (or equivalent), taking issue with their comments by calling them "snarky"?

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

These aren't journalists, they're gossip hounds, and you should be both smart enough to know the difference, and strong enough to not let it provoke you.
 
Richard,

You should take the Globe's note as a compliment. it is wonderful news that you will be working at 02138. You have built a well deserved readership with Harvard Rules, this blog and the articles in 02138. You are a credible and well respected commentator on Higher Education and on Harvard.

It is clear that to many your commentary is worth much more than anyone the Globe publishes about Higher Education or Harvard. Perhaps this is the reason for the blow, not the fact that they were not informed first about your new assignment.

Ignore them. On the issues that you cover the Globe is no competition to you. And perhaps, as with other print media, the Globe has good reason to be concerned about the effects of new journalism in blogs on more conventional media.

Congratulations on your new asssignment!
 
but you do need to live up to this more scholarly view your readers have of you as a journalist, a Tom Brokow type. You can't get down to responding to provocations from gossip mongers and you should continue to travel the high road of journalism, a la the Chronicle of Higher Education or the Economist, never a la Globe...
 
You know what? I agree with the folks who say that I should laugh this stuff off. Thanks for the support. The journalism aspect of it does bother me, though. The Boston Globe is supposed to be one of the country's finest newspapers (in theory, at least). One expects more of it.

Also, to the person who says that I'm the pot calling the kettle black; I honestly don't think that I'm snarky on this blog. That may sound strange, but if I take a shot at someone, I try to do so on the merits, not about anything personal. It's certainly true, as I think Standing Eagle remarked not too long ago in a slightly different context, that it's important to remember that the people mentioned on this blog are human, not mere abstractions.
 
SE: Sprichst du deutch?
 
Wieso nicht?
 
wer Sie sind, J.R.?
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger