The Ombudsman Comes Through
Some of you will remember my suggestion here that it was particularly inappropriate for the K-School 4 to impinge on free speech given that they were also Crimson editors.
Now the paper's ombudsman, Michael Kolber, reports that there are a lot more Crimson editors than you might think.
The Crimson currently claims that about 800 undergraduates are Crimson “editors.” That’s because, until recently, it identified anyone who has ever joined the staff as an “editor.” Joining the staff involves writing a certain number of stories (or taking photos or designing pages as the case may be) and attending a few seminars, steps fully one in eight undergrads has taken.
800 editors? No wonder the Crimson doesn't worry about grade inflation. It's a massive practitioner of title inflation. Kolber says that only about 200 to 275 of those folks "regularly contribute" to the paper. I'd be surprised if the real number is half that. (Also, 200-275 is a pretty broad range.)
But let's be conservative and say that there are at least 600 Crimson "editors" floating around campus who don't actually do anything for the paper.
As a former editor myself, I dislike this policy on the basis of accuracy in diction. These people are not "editors," and the vast majority of them never were, even when they were active on the paper.
The Crimson has now decided to call them "inactive editors." Better, but not good enough. The paper needs a new term for people who worked on it for a couple months, then quit. Contributor?