Shots In The Dark
Friday, February 16, 2024
  Faust: She's no Hellcat
Daniel Hemel responds to the right-wing jeers—predicted on this blog the day of Faust's choice—charging that Faust is a radical feminist with this Crimson editorial.

Forget, for a moment, that most intelligent people believe in equal rights for women and, like Faust, technically fall under the rubric of “feminist.” Faust has been branded with the F-word by writers who have clearly never read her work....

This is a fascinating issue, I must say, and a slightly tricky one for lefties, who are willing to cheer Faust for being a woman and writing history about women while at the same time saying, Don't worry, she's no "feminist."

Hey, she obviously is a feminist. Her rejection of the "it's a man's world, sweetie," line from her mother—and the centrality of that anecdote to her bio-narrative—establish that.

So what? What's wrong with being a feminist?

Problem is, of course, hardly anyone knows or can agree upon what that word means these days, which is why so many women shun it. But Faust is certainly of the generation that used it; she did graduate from Bryn Mawr in 1968.....

This may be one way that the Summers legacy continues. His presidency—his identity, his Washington experience, his leadership style—politicized the university, and his departure became a tug-of-war between the political left and right, particularly outside 02138.

Now that fight is continuing in an ongoing attempt by both sides to define Faust within a political box....
 
Comments:
"a tug-of-war between the political left and right, particularly outside 02138."
This battle is almost entirely outside 02138 (except for the very few people who are trying unsuccessfuly to keep it alive on campus). One of the most striking things about Summers' departure is how quickly the divisions healed. It was mostly the faculty against Summers, not against one another, and now that the virus is removed, the organism is quickly getting back to normal. Nothing like the divisiveness over VietNam or other political battles.
 
President Derek Bok must take expedient action as Harvard University Professor Ruth Wisse is publicly on record admitting to hiring what most reasonable persons would conclude is an alien not legally authorized to work in the United States.

This constitutes a serious violation of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)

As Professor Wisse is a well known member of the faculty of Harvard University and as she has acknowledge to potentially breaking the law in a public and visible forum that regularly addresses matters related to said University, her comments may extend liability to the University.

The Office of Legal Counsel should look into this matter expeditiously and take appropriate action to limit potential risks to the University resulting from Professor Wisse reckless and potentially deleterious public remarks about breaking the law.
 
This extremely serious issue should lead the Office of General Counsel to approach all internal finalists in the presidential search and inquire as to the legal status of their cleaning ladies.

Professor Wisse's admission has inadvertently set the ground for a potentially explosive public expose that would cause much damage to Harvard's reputation.
 
The OGC should extend this inquiry into the legal status of the cleaning ladies of the Deans.
 
A year ago, Martin Weitzman, Harvard University's Ernest E. Monrad Professor of Economics, allegedly got caught stealing $20 worth of manure from a farmer in Rockport.

In a court settlement Weitzman agreed to pay restitution in the amount of $600 to 98-year-old farmer Charles L. “Charlie” Lane Sr. for stealing the truckload of manure, which has a market value of about $20. He also agreed to donate $300 to the Rockport Boy Scouts in lieu of performing community service.

An FAS disciplinary committee demoted Professor Weitzman of the endowed chair. In its deliberations the committee discussed the bad example that he had set for students first in stealing the product, and secondly in settling for $900 for a product trading at $20 in the open market.

Hiring an illegal alien is a much more serious offense than stealing $20 worth of manure.
 
It appears that the FAS disciplinary committee extended Professor Weitzman the same penalty extended Professor Schleifer, who cost the University a 26.5 million settlement with the US government over alleged wrongdoing in Russia. In addition Professor Schleifer paid 2 million worth of damages and the firm employing his wife paid 1.5 million.

It appears that at Harvard $20 equals $30 million.
 
At Harvard, under normal presidencies, $20 does NOT equal $30 million. Obviously Schleifer had a bigger protector than Weitzman, and the protector may have confused University resources with his own.
 
9:23, excluding comments referencing "your mom" and other variants thereof, this is the dumbest thing I have ever read as a comment on this blog. Just because the cleaning lady is Brazilian does not make her illegal. What's more, even if she were, Harvard's liability for her would be zero. What's MORE--this has nothing to do with Daniel Hemel's predictably outstanding article.

9:41, I have mild hope that you are kidding; 9:48... Hee. :) Start with Dean Gross?
 
Perhaps another disciplinary committee should look into the consequences of the confusions of a protector that so poorly managed the authority and trust vested in him.
 
I have to say, I can think of more logical ways to get the debate from Hemel to Shleifer.
 
Hey anon 10:13 think again...

How many US college graduates do you know who seek work as cleaning ladies?

Is there anything in Brazilian culture that would make college educated women particularly attracted to jobs cleaning the toilets and washing the bedlinens of elderly Harvard professors?

Of, per chance, is Professor Wisse so charming that a young brazilian college graduate with other options for employment would prefer to work as her maid?

Isn't it possible, just possible, that Professor Wisse is one of the many beneficiaries of the reserve army of labour, to use Karl Marx term, represented by illegal immigrants?
 
10:13

Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood ring a bell? Financial or political liability?

BTW, has the professor acknowledged the status of her employee.

Perhaps the conversation should pause until the status is stipulated.
 
There are many clues in Professor Wisse about the status of her employee:

1. She is of Brazilian nationality --hence not American.

2. She spoke very limited English a year ago --hence not a student, and not on a student visa as students must demonstrate English language proficiency to be admitted in any program other than an English language program.

3. She is college educated and majored in government in Brazil --hence someone likely to PREFER work in sectors other than cleaning homes.

4. She has an interest in academic matters, in Harvard and has a view on how President Faust may differ from President Summers --hence someone with a taste for the academy, not the usual professional cleaning lady.

Which could be the legal status of someone with these characteristics:

1. A student on a student visa? Unlikely given her limited English a year ago.

2. A permanent resident alien --green card holder. Also unlikely as permanent residents can only obtain green cards after 5 years of legal residence in the US, serving in the US military or marrying an american citizen. Unlikely someone with these characteristics would have the limited language skills described by Professor Wisse.

3. A holder of an employment visa for highgly skilled workers. Unlikely such a person would moonlight cleaning toilets and floors. Those visas are typically issued only to individuals with corporate sponsors or to distinguished artists or athletes.

4. Someone with a tourist visa --unlikely as those do not typically exceed 6 months.

By this process of elimination, the cleaning lady is probably an 'overstayer' someone who entered the US legally on a tourist visa and stayed on, or someone who entered the US illegally by car, truck or foot. Such individuals are illegally in the US and employing them is a major legal offense punishable by stiff fines and prison.
 
Anon 10.40pm

You are interested in legal matters and in women in positions of power. You obviously know how Janet Reno rose to the position of Attorney General.

What if you were to rise in the same way? by the mistakes of others now chosen?
 
Let's hope the Corporation asked the finalists about the legal status of their cleaning ladies.
 
Perhaps the Progressive Student Labor Movement should conduct an inquiry into which Deans hire cleaning ladies who are not legally allowed to work, and find out what they pay them...

A concern for a living wage at Harvard should extend to those who depress local wages by paying illegals below living wages.
 
Perhaps the Progressive Student Labor Movement should conduct an inquiry into which Deans hire cleaning ladies who are not legally allowed to work, and find out what they pay them...

A concern for a living wage at Harvard should extend to those who depress local wages by paying illegals below living wages.
 
hey 11:12

Nope, no interest in legal matters or women in positions of power. And, never be so silly as to think you know what other people are interested in especially via a medium such as this-you look foolish.

What I do find interesting is how sloppy the thinking can be in this venue.

So, with that in mind, are you suggesting that Faust ascended to president's positon in the same way as Reno? If you have specific and relevant information to undergird such an asertion, spill the beans, dude.

Re your last comment-are you attempting to lecture me or admonish me in some way with the last comment? Sorry, self employed so blows that theory.

BTW, how did you come by your situation? Hard work, lucky break, you married the bosses daughter or did a "mentor" fix it for you-don't lie (especially to yourself because I don't care.)

You come off as bully-change your tune cause you can be easily whupped, and dude and never ask a question you dont know the answer to-I hope you dont teach at the law school-please tell me you dont teach at the law school........
 
Richard:

So less than one week after the announcement of Harvard's new president and the conversation swirls around some flunky professor's cleaning lady's immigration status-what's with that?

Geez, and these are the people who are supposed to educate and train the next crop of world leaders-should we be afraid?

Where is the substance?
 
Hey 11:43, make yourself a cup of coffee or (better) turn in, dude
 
12:02, this is a blog, not a Harvard faculty forum. Lighten up!
 
by the looks and feel of this thing it is a faculty forum even if it is supposed to be a blog.

so i guess we'll have to endure their hissy fits every now and then. is that place the island of misfit toys or what!
 
10:34: Yeah, I thought again, and I'm still right. It's *possible*, but it's not likely. As has been true for many nationalities... it almost doesn't matter if you are college-educated in this country if you don't speak English. Imagine a legal immigrant, a government major from Brazil; she speaks no English. What job would you suggest she get in the U.S.? Do you really think all the immigrants working blue-collar jobs have no education? You're wrong.

Now I'm going to stop engaging this, because as 12:02 points out, this debate has no substance (and close to no relevance).

-Hopping Rabbit
 
I employed the "your mom" response earlier b/c since the Faust announcement, this blog has degraded largely into an embarrassing FAS faculty forum, one that accomplishes nothing save exposing the out-of-touch, self-important nature of many anonymous tenured faculty members (meaning not you, RT). But since anyone associated with Harvard is already savvy to this (often the price of doing business in higher ed), I believe this blog has run its course. The Larry chapter has closed with Faust's ascension. Rich should draw this, at times interesting, discussion to a close and pull the plug--if only to save the faculty from further ridicule. I, for one, would follow you to a baseball-only blog, Richard (you seem to be growing understandably tired of Harvard). It's obvious from the wholly inappropriate Wisse speculation above that faculty members will continue to spew Harvard gossip, while you must recognize that all of the Harvard gossip fit to print has come and gone.
 
12:10

couldnt agree with you more!

given that sentiment (which i venture the majority shares), perhaps in its wisdom the corporation picked the absolute best choice to return normalcy to the institution.

i for one (or is that two counting 12:10) am ready for some baseball-red sox of course.
 
I think 12:10 and 12:23 have it right. The Harvard part of this blog has been a very good forum, even given the general anonymity, but it has served its purpose and is unlikely to have substantive value in the future. We are clearly at the beginning of a new phase, and one that will be marked by the sort of cooperative discussion, decision-making, and action that doesn't make for an exciting blog, even if it does allow us to get back to what matters. Of course SITD would provide opportunities for deploring or praising the various decanal appointments that will be made in the coming weeks . . . Up to Richard of course, and baseball and Dylan are indeed still going on.
 
SITD is what?
 
This blog, Shots in the Dark.
 
thank you!
 
I appreciate all the input...but somehow, I doubt that Harvard will grow boring overnight. I think I'll continue to call 'em as I see 'em. And to the extent that Drew Faust brings a different kind of leadership, that's great. Somehow, I'm sure there will continue to be things to talk about.
 
In fact, I suspect there'll be things to talk about...soon.
 
Richard:

Like what?

What do you believe the agenda will be? Or, rather, what do you think it ought to be? Not a challenge-just curiuos.
 
To start, I think that Drew Faust is a very interesting woman and it's going to be exciting to follow her presidency. After all, her supporters can't exactly say that she's an historic appointment, now go away.

I suppose I'm curious to see what she's going to do. We don't have a strong sense of her vision of the University; I'm sure that will be emerging in the months to come.

Mostly, I believe that Harvard is a fascinating place and that it always provides things to discuss.
 
I will say that I find the commentary about Ruth Wisse and her maid somewhat odd.
 
Antisemitic in their effect if not in their intent? LOL.
 
Anon 11.43pm. Happy New Year 'Dude'.

It's kind of sad, isn't it, to celebrate the Year of the Boar eating a nice buffet, all by yourself, too tired to wear your contacts, pretending to read a paper... all while thinking that just a little over a week they could have chosen you.

Kung Kei Fat Choi!
 
But it was Ruth Wisse herself who brought up her cleaning lady in a published commentary about President Faust. So what's odd, that she chose to use her cleaning lady's admiration for the new President as a way to mock Faust or that she may have put her foot in her mouth if indeed she unadvertengly admitted that she may be hiring an illegal alien?
 
In her published article 'Dr. Faust, My cleaning lady and me' Professor Wisse creates an intellectual product using information obtained from a human subject --her cleaning lady.

Did Professor Wisse inform her cleaning lady that she intended to write an article based on their conversation? Did she inform her that she intended to 'out' her as a Brazilian, with limited English proficiency, and to out her private views on the newly appointed Harvard President? If Professor Wisse did not do this, if she did not obtained informed consent, she has violated a fundamental protocol of research with human subjects. She has, in effect if not in intent, drawn intellectual property from a human subject, potentially exposing this subject to risk, without informing her subject of her intent to doing this.

This is a very serious breach of academic conduct.

This morning my cleaning lady E., expecting an affirmative response, asked me whether I was pleased by the appointment of a woman to the presidency of Harvard University (where I am a professor). A year ago her English was not good enough for such a question. College-educated in São Paolo, with what I believe was a major in government, she tells me a female president will be able to smooth over the troubles of the previous administration. Evidently, she perceives the ascendancy of Drew Gilpin Faust as a boost for her own chances of advancement in America. Apparently, Brazilian women gained fully equal legal rights only in 1988.

Just a day earlier I was reading Heather Mac Donald’s post at City Journal’s Eye on the News, in which she remarks that “The feminist takeover of Harvard is imminent.” Her warning struck a nerve. When the Women’s Lib movement started up in America in the 1960’s, I predicted it would do as much damage here as Bolshevism had done in Russia. I felt almost vindicated in my fears when I watched the feminist culture of grievance at Harvard help to topple President Lawrence Summers (a controversy I wrote about in the pages of COMMENTARY)—who tried to pacify the aggrieved women by appointing none other than Drew Faust to head a Task Force on Women Faculty. That Task Force won a $50 million commitment to increase faculty “diversity efforts” at Harvard. In the past, the call for such “diversity” has been a code name for greater ideological conformism, since those appointed through it are expected to share the ideological premise that brought them the job.

My Portuguese is not up to E.’s English, so I cannot explain to her the difference between a woman and a Women’s Libber. She is still fighting the original feminist battle for equal rights and opportunity; I oppose the demand for preferential group advancement. But E. is keen, and she sees from my hesitation that I am not quite as inspired as she is by this appointment. We will watch events unfold at Harvard with unequal expectations.
 
Professor Wisse is a writer and a Professor of Comparative Literature. Her field of study is language. Language is her fundamental working tool.

Writer use words intentionally. Particularly when writing short pieces, every word counts. When writing under a strict word limit there are no accidents in which words are used and in which are left out.

Which brings us to a puzzle in Professor Wisse's article. Why did she choose to specify that her cleaning lady was Brazilian? What was it that Professor Wisse was intending to communicate in making explicit the nationality of her cleaning lady?

One can answer this question by doing a simple experiment. Edit Professor Wisse's commentary eliminating the references to the cleaning lady. Further, edit it inserting references to the fact that the cleaning lady is foreign born, without specifcying her nationality. What changes?

Without references to the Brazilian nationality the article is about the contrasting expectations of two women regarding the appointment of the first woman President at Harvard University. These two women have different social status and occupations. The point that different people may expect different things from the new President comes clearly across.

Substituting 'Foreign' or 'Immigrant' for 'Brazilian', the same point comes across in the story, with the added value that we now know that the different expectations are between a low status immigrant woman and a Harvard Professor.

So why did Professor Wisse need to specify that her cleaning lady was 'Brazilian'. Did she mean 'Colored'? or 'From a Poor Country?'. How does adding these connotations change the meaning of her story?

Perhaps Professor Wisse, as a scholar of language, of Comparative literature, owes her students, colleagues and readers a longer explanation of her intent, if not of her effect. One unconstrained by the space limitations of short commentaries. And perhaps also, she owes an apology to her cleaning lady.
 
Can you hear the drums? It seems the cannibal profs smell blood in the water. Look out, Ruth, the white van will be coming soon, and then it's off to...diversity training. Turns out, there are daggers in women's smiles as well.
 
Even as Professor Wisse finds herself skeptical of Drew Faust President she may find it useful to read 'Mothers of Invention: Women of the Slaveholding South in the American Civil War'. Perhaps she will find some parallels between the lives and views of these women and her own.
 
It is quite informative to discover that one of the staunchest supporters of Larry Summers may herself have more than a little problem with her brazilian cleaning lady...
 
Is the implication of R.W. article that Drew Faust as a Harvard President is more appealing to a cleaning lady than to a Harvard Professor? Is this what she said in effect, if not in intent? Is she calling Drew Faust the President of cleaning ladies, and brazilian to boot?
 
Is it anti-semitic to call a racist a racist?
 
Can you imagine if the morning shows on tuesday had an interview with... the cleaning lady!
 
"E's" code name is Chauncy Gardner and she'll take over the Taskforce on Women sometime this summer after receiving her honorary degree at commencement while learning English as a second language at the Extension school paid for, of course, by Prof. Wisse. H-1B Visa will be sorted out by the same crack staff (inter-departmental team from HLS, KSG, SEIU local 615 and of course the Harvard Living Wage Campaign) tasked with resolving Wisse's fine for employing an illegal alien.
 
Why do you assume that the cleaning lady is an idiot --Chauncy Gardner? Because she is a cleaning lady? because she is brazilian? or because she works for Professor Wisse?
 
Getting there is half the fun; being there is all of it!

Get a sense of humor please!
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger