Send As SMS
Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, January 09, 2024
  The Crimson Scoops the Times
A day after the Times runs a piece about Harvard potentially choosing a female president—illustrated with photographs of Ruth Simmons and Amy Gutmann—the Crimson makes the paper look silly.

Javier Hernandez and Daniel Shuker report that the presidential search committee has narrowed its choices to the following: John Etchemendy, Drew Faust, Elena Kagan, and Alison Richard. (The reporters qualify that group by adding that "a dark horse candidate could still yet [sic] emerge.")

First off, what to make of the fact that Etchemendy has expressed his lack of interest in the job? You can parse his words—see item below—for wiggle room, but when he calls his current position "the best job in higher education," that's pretty tough to back away from.

Alison Richard, by contrast, has said that she remains "deeply committed" to the vice-chancellorship of Cambridge, but that's a nothing statement.

In any case, according to the Crimson, "sources close to the committee have said that the group is not paying attention to candidates' publicly stated interest or disinterest in the presidency. "

Here's another interesting tidbit:

While many informed observers have long considered Kagan a leading candidate for the presidency, the two sources said that some members of the committee currently view her as a relatively weaker contender compared with other candidates.

One wonders if the search committee has said to Kagan, "You're sitting in your office and the phone rings. It's Larry Summers, the man who appointed you the first female dean of the Harvard Law School, your old colleague from the Clinton administration. Summers wants a favor. What do you do?"

The choice of anyone other than Kagan would surely diminish Larry Summers' influence in Mass Hall come September, when he returns to 02138...

My picks, in order of likelihood:

1) Drew Faust
2) Alison Richard (a very close second...but does she have Harvard ties? Don't think so.)
3) Elena Kagan
4) John Etchemendy
 
Comments:
Well here's the deal on these denials: If Etchemendy sits down for a "final-round interview," as the Crimson reports he will, then anything else he says is irrelevant. Also, I don't think anyone will give him shit, should he be selected, for having said that the Stanford provostship is the best job in higher ed. Isn't that a standard, party line?
 
He doesn't have to backtrack at all. He could say the Stanford job was indeed the best, but he'll find out soon enough if Harvard's is better. And even then, it may not be the best job in higher ed but it is the most important and necessary job, and he couldn't be more honored, etc.
 
actually, he probably ismn't going to have to worry about what to say, as he is llikely to spend the rest of his career at Stanford...
 
Richard: Shleifer, not Schleifer. Schuker, not Shuker. Love the zen.
 
Not only the scoop but the real reporting is worth praising. The TIMES piece was shameful. Richard: your criticism was on point. But the reporting was even worse than you suggested. Who is this Finder person? He makes M-Bomb look like Woodward-Bernstein.
 
Why is Kagan still in there? She may be OK as a Law School Dean, but she has no broad academic credentials, is a politician-type (remind you of anyone?), and is said to have a short fuse. Sounds like another ex-Clinton cabinet person to be avoided to me.
 
Why is it surprising that LHS appointed politician type deans?

Most of his appointments were of that type. Shallow intellects, good political skills and above all a willingness to accept his authority and to be second.

Don't be surprised if that is also exactly what the Corporation chooses. They seem determined to make Harvard a second rate University.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2024 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2024 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2024 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2024 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2024 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2024 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2024 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2024 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2024 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2024 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2024 - 03/31/2006 / 04/01/2024 - 04/30/2006 / 05/01/2024 - 05/31/2006 / 06/01/2024 - 06/30/2006 / 07/01/2024 - 07/31/2006 / 08/01/2024 - 08/31/2006 / 09/01/2024 - 09/30/2006 / 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2006 / 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2006 / 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2006 / 01/01/2024 - 01/31/2007 /


Powered by Blogger