Send via SMS
Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, February 21, 2024
  The Journal Article
For you fellow non-subscribers, here it is:

Summers to Quit Harvard Presidency
By DANIEL GOLDEN and ZACHARY M. SEWARD
February 21, 2006; Page A3
Lawrence H. Summers, losing a power struggle with faculty after a turbulent five years as president of Harvard University, is expected to resign this week.

Two people familiar with the situation said last night that the former U.S. Treasury secretary is expected to announce his resignation in advance of a faculty vote a week from today on a motion of no confidence in his leadership. It's unclear what plan Harvard may have for naming a successor or when Mr. Summers's resignation will take effect.


Backing for Mr. Summers from Harvard's seven-member governing board, known as the Corporation, has eroded in recent weeks in the face of renewed criticism from many arts and sciences faculty members, the people familiar with the matter said. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, a Corporation member who pushed for Mr. Summers's appointment in 2001, remains a supporter and was making calls on his behalf to at least one key Harvard official last week, one person familiar with the situation said. Several board members, including former Duke University president Nannerl Keohane and Urban Institute president Robert Reischauer, have been interviewing deans, faculty members and alumni in recent weeks about Mr. Summers's performance.

Mr. Summers and Corporation members couldn't be reached for comment. A Harvard spokesman declined to comment.

Mr. Summers's supporters, and even some of his detractors, say they are worried it will be difficult for Harvard to find a strong successor now that the faculty has demonstrated its clout. His propensity for controversial comments on educational and national issues was regarded by admirers as a welcome change from other college presidents who devote themselves primarily to fund raising. His resignation could renew concerns about whether presidents of elite universities can use their "bully pulpit" as they once did to express opinions on vital issues without risking their positions.

Mr. Summers's resignation would end the shortest stint of any Harvard president since Cornelius Felton died in 1862 after two years in office. The Corporation selected Mr. Summers, a renowned economist, as a strong leader who would assert his authority over entrenched fiefdoms. His achievements include establishing an institute on stem-cell research, increasing faculty size and expanding Harvard's campus.

However, a number of his initiatives, including curriculum reform, have bogged down. His brusque management style and sometimes outspoken views have offended faculty members and led to turnover among deans.

Arts and sciences faculty members voted no confidence in Mr. Summers last year after he gave a talk suggesting that innate gender differences might account for the relative scarcity of women with high-level academic careers in science and math. Faculty critics this year began assailing him on matters varying from the resignation of a key dean to the lack of any university discipline meted out to economics professor Andrei Shleifer, a close friend of the president. Last year, Harvard and Mr. Shleifer settled a civil suit brought by the federal government, stemming from allegations that he had violated conflict-of-interest rules by investing in financial markets in Russia while heading a foreign-aid program there.>>

 
Comments:
This is welcome news indeed for those who want to see Harvard regain a focus on education.
(One aside, however: as a journalist, and critic of the Google-Harvard initiative, what is the justification of your posting an entire WSJ article (rather than summarizing it) on your blog site? I, for one, would have bought the WSJ today simply to read the article, but now I wont...The ethics of this are very complicated, I think.)
 
Well, I look at this way: It's darn good advertising for the Journal—I blogged yesterday about what a good reporter Dan Golden is.

But yes, your point is a fair one. In general, I don't make a habit of posting articles. (Although sometimes the source likes it, as it provides a greater distribution for the article.)

So, yup...complicated.
 
Thank god Summers is going so this blog can move on to more interesting topics, like music, women, cars, gadgets, sex, women and sports. Oh yeah, and chicks.
 
Somehow a Maxim reader has gotten lost in the blogosphere.
 
Actually, he probably writes for the Crimson editorial board...
 
Now there's a snarky cheap shot
 
Lighten up, folks. It was a joke! I understand the Crimson is feeling a little sensitive right now—they're getting bashed by the faculty, and that poll was pretty boneheaded, and they got scooped by their own former managing editor in the Wall Street Journal. But on the whole, you guys are doing fine—well, your edit board looks pretty silly, that's true—but the reporting, I think, has been solid.

All right, that 15 Minutes interview with Judith Ryan looks worse and worse in retrospect.

So I'm losing my own argument. Still, I think you have to have tougher skin than this. You've probably pissed off people on both sides, and that's a good sign.
 
Hey, who's insulting who here? I'm lost.

Anyway, ponder this: in all likelihood, Larry Summers has never slept with anyone sporting a tattoo in his life. What does that mean?
 
The poll was obviously written up in a rather confusing way that underplayed the disparities in response between men/women and freshman/upperclassmen, but it wasn't "boneheaded." The fact is that most students, quite clearly from the overwhelming feeling in the poll response, do think summers shouldn't have resigned, and it's not the crimson's fault that this is the case and that most people on this website feel the opposite way.
 
Anonymous one: okay, boneheaded was unfair. My bad. And I'm willing to believe that a majority of students did not think that Summers should resign. But "most"? That I wonder about. And I think the 3:1 ratio was, in that regard, highly misleading. Since it followed closely on the heels of the Crimson's pro-Summers endorsement, and there were some problems with the poll, it did look a little...calculated.
 
An interesting fact that seems to have been overlooked so far: the only reason Seward was at the Wall Street Journal to break the Summers story was because he was asked to leave Harvard for a term after failing an English class -- apparently due to his devotion to the Crimson. He leaves, grabs a job at the WSJ, keeps his old Crimson sources, gets to break the story...See http://www.harvardindependent.com/media/paper369/news/2006/02/09/News/Shakeup.At.The.Crimson-1606944.shtml?norewrite&sourcedomain;=www.harvardindependent.com
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2024 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2024 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2024 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2024 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2024 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2024 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2024 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2024 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2024 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2024 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2024 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2024 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2024 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2024 - 03/31/2006 /


Powered by Blogger