The Decline and Fall of the American Aristocracy
Posted on January 17th, 2007 in Uncategorized | 9 Comments »
Another wedding in the Times Style section caught my eye, that of Andree Finkle and Carter Worth.
That’s Carter Braxton Worth, to you.
The short write-up included a paragraph unlike any I’ve seen before in one of these marital notices.
The bridegroom is a descendant of William Brewster, a religious leader of Plymouth Colony; of Carter Braxton, a signer of the Declaration of Independence; and of Chief Justice John Marshall.
Holy cow! This guy’s got more bloodlines than Count Dracula!
So what does this descendant of greats, named after a signer of the Declarationâwho takes his lineage so seriously that he includes it on the form you send to the Times in the hopes they will pick you for inclusionâdo with himself?
Mr. Worth, 40, is the chief market technician at Oppenheimer & Company, the investment bank in New York….
Sigh.
I don’t think I’ll ever understand the mentality that says, “I’m a noteworthy person because of what my ancestors did,” but at the same time, chooses a career without any social value whatsoever…..
9 Responses
1/17/2007 11:29 am
does your last sentence apply to Chelsea Clinton, too?
1/17/2007 11:49 am
It does, in factâas I’ve said on this blog before.
1/17/2007 12:59 pm
It’s fine to rag on people who choose to be investment bankers. And it’s fine to note the decline of the aristocracy. But your linking of the two here contains a bubble of unadulterated goo composed of equal parts envy and snobbery. (Or is it must me?)
Granting for the moment the highly dubious proposition that investment banking has no social utility whatever, your piece assumes that someone who has the “bloodlines” this guy does is genetically better prepared to contribute to society than is the average person. Now where, pray tell, do you derive such a proposition? You use the term “aristocracy” but this country has, of course, no such thing. (On the contrary, that was one of the things Americans sought to escape.) True, families such as this young man’s once held themselves out as the social elite, and claimed to raise their young with a sense of duty to country, etc., but not only has the time when this was remotely true long passed, but it was never true as a general proposition to begin with. Most of these families were robber barons, or earlier versions thereof.
In sum, not detecting any particular irony in your nostalgia-laden comments, I, as a proud African-American descendant of slaves, reject, on behalf of all of the dispossessed peoples of this misbegotten “plantation” of a country, reject your suggestion that this Times puff piece means anything at all.
1/17/2007 1:37 pm
Rich,
Why don’t you explain to us all why a career in investment banking has no “social value whatsoever”?
1/17/2007 3:22 pm
Richard, your blog leaves a terrible taste in my mouth! Why be so snobby?
I don’t even agree with what one of the bloggers above said — that it is “fine to rag on people who choose to be investment bankers.” Why is that? Who are we to judge the careers others choose? And why should investment banking be any less worthy than, say, social work?
Who says that choosing a career that makes money (yes, ok, alot of it!) is intrinsically bad, or means somehow that this person is selfish, or a non-contributor to society (what you were clearly implying in the blog)? Hey, what if this Carter Braxton Worth loves what he does - and is good at it -isn’t that a contribution to society in and of itself? (As long as you are not hurting anyone , I think so.)
Regardless, the singular fact of what someone does for a living does not necessarily speak for that person’s values or contribution to society; rather, it’s the total picture that counts — who the person is as a whole, and what they do in ALL aspects of his or her life, that speak for one’s character, and contribution to society.
And do we even know if he is involved in any charities and/or does volunteer work? Maybe he is!
Or, what if he is able to contribute to society BECAUSE of what he does - like, say, Warren Buffett? Do we still judge him just because he makes money?
Sure, he probably has more responsibility to give back to society than others who are less fortunate. But bashing someone because of the singular fact that he or she has chosen investment banking as a career is short sighted!
1/17/2007 3:46 pm
Admittedly this wasn’t the most incisive analysis I’ve seen on this blog (for one thing, the guy is a “chief market technician” — which, translated, means he’s NOT an I-banker), but jeez, people, just as it is unlikely anything printed in the NY Times Weddings pages is going to impact humankind one way or another, the whimsical (if slight) tweaking administered here is undeserving of such solemn deconstruction. (That includes you, my proud African-American slavester.) People, lighten up — preppie-bashing is a cherished feature of our times and who better to continue the tradition than, um, our own RB!
1/17/2007 4:20 pm
Reading period at Harvard / vacation for everyone else tends to be a slow news period.
1/17/2007 5:38 pm
11:59, you are a nincumpoop. And to everyone else (save 2:46), someone who references his/her lineage past their grandparents in any bio-especially a brief one-is a no account buster.
1/18/2007 12:16 pm
4:38 - strangely, you have both called me (11:59) a nincompoop and exempted me (“save 2:46″) from same. i’m all confused now.