Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
  How Journalism Works
A fascinating piece by David Kirkpatrick in today's Times on Mitt Romney's relationship with his dad, George W. Romney. But as I read it, I couldn't help but feel that I'd read parts of it before.

Then I realized that the reason for that was because I'd written parts of it!


In a handful of details, written in consecutive paragraphs, the Times simply lifted my reporting.

Below, in Roman type, here's what the Times writes today, and in italics, what I wrote in the spring 2007 issue of 02138:

At Harvard, Mitt Romney carried an old leather brief case bearing his father’s initials, GWR...

“He only had one thing that was even possibly an affectation,” says Phillips. “He carried his dad’s briefcase with him everywhere he went. It was brown leather, totally scratched and scuffed, the initials ‘GWR’ in gold in the middle. It looked like it had been through World War I and World War II and the Cold War. It was the only sign he gave of a link to being from a politically or economically privileged family…


....and wrote a seminar paper on a car maker and its dealerships — an issue his father had faced.

As we spoke, [professor emeritus Detlev] Vagts walked over to a file cabinet and pulled out a 30-year-old folder—papers from the seminar Vagts taught, “Law and Business Problems.” Romney’s was still there. Titled “Dual-Distribution in the Automobile Industry,” the paper considered the practice by which manufacturers sell products through both company channels and independent distributors.

Later, Mr. Romney arranged a private meeting for his father with William F. Weld, then governor of Massachusetts.

George Romney talked about volunteerism — a personal passion — for an hour, but his son’s reaction is all Mr. Weld remembers. “He sat there hunched forward a bit with his elbows on his knees and his head in his hands just beaming at his father from a distance of two or maybe three feet,” Mr. Weld recalled. “It was undiluted hero worship.”

“His father’s a complete lodestar for him,” says former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld. In early 1995, Romney brought his father to visit then-Governor Weld; George Romney wanted to talk about volunteerism, a longtime cause. “I was sitting behind the desk that later became Mitt’s desk, and George talked for a solid hour,” Weld says. “Mitt was just sitting there looking at his father, just beaming the whole time. He didn’t say a word, he was so proud.

Well, at least Kirkpatrick did enough work after reading my story to call up Bill Weld and get his own quote.

It's a small point, but this lack of credit-giving is typical of the arrogance of the Times: When you lift three consecutive, highly specific facts from another piece, idiosyncratic facts that haven't been reported elsewhere—and then you write them in consecutive paragraphs—you really ought to say, according to a profile of Romney in the magazine 02138.

Why don't Times reporters follow that basic practice? Two reasons. One, they're arrogant and don't think they have to. And two, they want you to think that they did all the reporting.

In the pre-blog era, they could get away with this stuff....
 
Comments:
Look, we have a practice of citing only to sources people have actually heard of. If we use something from a webzine or small press rag like 02138 we practice abstinence, otherwise we'd be saying "as reported to" every other sentence. And where would that get us, huh?

- David Kirkpatrick

P.S. Thanks for the material though.
 
LOL....
 
I hope you forward this post to Romenesko. Outrageous.
 
In political reporting, some things get covered repeatedly. You don't think that it's possible that these people, having been interviewed multiple times, simply gave him the same material? Seems to me that Romney's dad's political legacy is obviously fair game for any reporter, and that shoe leather is likely to turn up the same things over and over and over when you're hitting on the same themes. It's not like the idea of writing a story about Romney and his dad is so original. It's like writing about Gore and his dad.

To clarify, I'm not saying it's not a good story idea, or that the 01238 piece isn't interesting. But "lifting" seems extreme. Did you write Kirkpatrick? Did he respond? I'd be curious to see what he said if you did...
 
Emu, those are fair points, and under most circumstances I'd agree with them. It's just that these particular facts/anecdotes are very specific, and other than the Weld one, they were not easy to track down--the thing about Romney's briefcase, for example, came from a long conversation with one of Romney's law school classmates who wouldn't have been an inevitable phone call in any profile. Also, the fact that these facts which all appeared in my piece appeared sequentially in Kirkpatrick's piece is another tip-off.

But no, I haven't e-mailed him. It's really not worth the time. The B.S. response I'm sure I'd get back would drive me up the wall.....
 
I did respond. See above.

DK
 
Richard:

Send the Times a bill for research and copywriting.

And if they dont pay it have it run in the other rag in the wonderful city of yours-the Times gets caught "borrowing" again.......Perhaps they can send you a free subscription.

If someone was caught "borrowing" someone else's work/writing at H what would happen to them?

Put it in the Crimson!
 
That can't possibly really be David Kirkpatrick. Can it? If it really is David Kirkpatrick, drop me an e-mail and let's discuss this off-line. You can find my e-mail address on the site, under "contact."
 
I'm in love with DK. If he had a perfume, it would be called "Obsolete".....

- Shannon
 
Richard, I'd drop you a line to discuss, but I'm too busy working on an article about the founder of Facebook.

-DK
 
Okay, okay. We've established that I'm gullible....
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 / 7/1/07 - 8/1/07 / 8/1/07 - 9/1/07 / 9/1/07 - 10/1/07 / 10/1/07 - 11/1/07 / 11/1/07 - 12/1/07 / 12/1/07 - 1/1/08 /


Powered by Blogger