Shots In The Dark
Thursday, October 18, 2007
  Sox Fans Viciously Turning on Each Other
In the Globe, Dan Shaughnessy already starts apportioning blame.

Theo Epstein is in for his share of finger-pointing if the Sox are eliminated by the Tribe. It's never a good thing when your $143 million payroll bites the dust against a team with a $61 million payroll. Dan Duquette assembled half of the 2004 champs, but what we are looking at today is almost exclusively Theo's team and it's his most recent acquisitions who have been exposed thus far in October.

I'm going to stick up for fellow Eli Theo here, and not just because he went to a fine school in a lovely New England town (have you been there lately?), with a kick-ass football team, but because it's an indirect way of sticking up for the Yankees.

Whenever the Yankees lose a playoff, you hear some pundits say, as Shaughnessy just did, How dare a team with a fill-in-the-blank payroll lose?

To which I've always said that beyond a certain point, your payroll bears a diminishing correlation to the excellence of your team.

The Yankees, for example, consistently overpay for free agents; their payroll could probably be 20% smaller than the 200 million or whatever it is and they'd still field basically the same team.

But in any case, there are lots of other factors involved in a team's success besides being able to pay players the most amount of money (as the Red Sox are finding out).

Team chemistry, young players, finding the right young pitchers—none of these things are guaranteed by having a big checkbook, and one could argue that sometimes having a lot of money to spend works against these intangibles.

Granted, on balance having a huge payroll gives a team a significant advantage in being able to sign the players it decides are essential.

Nonetheless, I think that the correlation between payroll size and winning is less automatic than Yankee (and now Sox) critics like to assume.

If you look at the Yankees now, for example, the most exciting players (Chamberlain, Hughes, Cano, Cabrera) are the ones being paid the least, and the most underperforming players (Clemens, Giambi, Mussina, perhaps Damon) are being paid in the eight-figures....

That said, I do enjoy Sox fans turning on each other like starving, rabid dogs.
 
Comments:
The day that the awful, stupid, and vicious Dan Shaughnessy represents all or even most Sox fans is the day that I stop rooting for the Sox. He is the worst -- always the first to attack after a loss, always the first to suck up and take credit for being there all along after a win. He cannot retire fast enough.
 
Interesting! Who do you like (who covers the Sox)?
 
My shoes?
 
The Herald did a very smart thing when they picked up Rob Bradford. I also like Seth Mnookin's blog. And Surviving Grady is essential, too.

And, of course, you might enjoy Yanksfan vs. Soxfan.

PS bye bye, Torre. Good luck keeping Posada and Rivera now.
 
SOX WIN! SOX WIN! SOX WIN!

Back to Fenway it is and Josh Beckett (now indubitably Cy Young recip.) has put the world aright again. Sox-Tribe 2-3, which makes it a toss-up, no?
 
Sox fans now a bit cheered.
 
I agree with 10:31 AM - Dan Shaughnessy is reviled almost universally among Sox fans. He made his name by creating "the curse" (though IIRC, the original concept wasn't his, go figure) and then shilling (not Schilling) the stupid thing for years. He's awful, and I would wager that nearly every Sox fan who is more than casual about their fandom would agree.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 / 7/1/07 - 8/1/07 / 8/1/07 - 9/1/07 / 9/1/07 - 10/1/07 / 10/1/07 - 11/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger