Shots In The Dark
Saturday, September 08, 2007
  Larry Summers and Used Cars
I have a friend who always used to clean rental cars she was returning to the rental place, purging them of food wrappers, newspapers, empty bottles and the like. Since this was before rental companies threatened to fine you for leaving a rental car in a state of disarray, I always found it odd.

"We're paying for them to clean the car," I would say to her. "Why do their work for them?"

It made no difference; she just thought it was the right thing to do.

I've always thought of that whenever I hear Larry Summers' axiom, "In the history of the world, no one has ever washed a rented car," quoted by Tom Friedman about a bazillion times.

In fact, I thought, some people do clean their rental cars. They may not take them to a carwash, but the use of the term "wash" is a clever red herring, because while people might not go that far out of their way, the principle at hand is cleaning, and lots of people clearly do clean their rental cars—and that suggests an interesting and irrational kind of economic behavior worth considering.

Apparently I'm not alone in feeling this way, because Tod Lindberg in the Weekly Standard has a piece about this exact issue.

I got to thinking about it the other day when I got back from the carwash with my rented car.
Alas, I am quite confident from my subsequent research that I will not go down in history as the first person to wash a rental....

There's a converse that I wish someone would also study, which is why people trash things that, in theory, belong to them. I live near Harlem where, I think it's safe to say, there's not exactly a culture of environmentalism, and I see people throwing their garbage on the street—their street—all the time. Cigarettes, fast food wrappers, Red Bull cans, etc.

If the ostensible theory behind not washing a rental car is that people don't take care of things they don't have an investment in (the case for home ownership, right?), then why do people abuse things in which they do have ownership?

Or perhaps there is a false assumption there.
 
Comments:
Interesting blog post. People probably don't take care of things they own or rent for the same reason they don't take care of their bodies. I wonder if there is a correlation there? Do we just not take responsibility for items in our charge? I am sure economics come into play, but laziness or the idea that someone else will take care of it (another way to say lazy I suppose) could be the reason too.
 
The false assumption is that you don't own your street. Many people have use of it and if everyone else is throwing garbage in the street, your extra garbage doesn't really matter. In economics, this is known as "the tragedy of the commons".
 
I agree with 12:12...this was an interesting post. And I agree with 12:12 on his other views. I am one of those who would clean up a rental car (maybe not wash it unless I had gotten it extraordinarily dirty, then I would), I try to keep my part of the neighbourhood clean and tidy...my house clean and tidy, as is my office if you don't count the clutter of family pictures) and my car and myself...and I'm not perfect...yet my neighbours next door are a good example... they own their home and actually spend far more money on theirs than I do....yet they don't take care of absolutely anything. I think it's a sense of responsibility...I was raised with it but it's also a personal choice. Renting or owning or economics or upbringing doesn't make all the difference....whether it's how you treat the planet, its people, or yourself.

lmpaulsen
 
Not only do the Harlemites you're referring to not own the street, they don't own their own homes either. And they don't work at a magazine, write books and blog in their spare time. And they haven't been to Harvard -- nor to Yale. And they're African-American, which may be relevant, though you smartly avoid saying so. All of which confirms Summers' proposition. But there's more: people who DO clean up rental cars don't disprove the proposition. They merely illustrate that an investment can take forms other than the financial. Assuming she's not just an obsessive-compulsive, your friend places a value (or "investment") in good manners and civil behavior, which in her view call upon her to tidy up the rental car before someone -- presumably black or hispanic and of lower socio-economic status -- does a more thorough cleaning. All this suggests that if someone has neither a financial nor a cultural investment in keeping their neighborhood clean, they won't do it.
 
It might be of some interest to you that the Doe Fund doesn't list your area as one they clean on their street cleaning map. Maybe this information online is out of date, but it may explain something.

http://tinyurl.com/2r2puo

eayny
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 / 6/1/07 - 7/1/07 / 7/1/07 - 8/1/07 / 8/1/07 - 9/1/07 / 9/1/07 - 10/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger