Shots In The Dark
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
  The Harvard Statement
Courtesy the Harvard Crimson website, here is the Harvard statement on the Kennedy School Four:


University Spokesman John D. Longbrake released the following statement just after midnight Wednesday morning.

Last Thursday, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III spoke at the Forum at the Kennedy School of Government. As required by Forum policy, his remarks were to be followed by a question and answer period in which audience members would have the opportunity to pose unfiltered questions to him. Four Harvard College students, acting in coordination, sequentially interrupted his remarks and disrupted the event. They were escorted from the Forum and arrested.

The University deeply values reasoned and constructive debate. The ideals of free speech encompass the right of a speaker to speak and the audience to hear. Without undermining either right, a member of the community may register dissent by any number of effective means. Choosing a device that is designed to disrupt an event or limit debate is not consistent with these ideals.

Given the importance of dissent in an academic community, the arrest of a student protestor remains a significant event. For that reason, the Harvard University Police Department has carefully reviewed the situation at the Forum. The University is persuaded that more could have been done in the circumstances to apprise the students that they were in jeopardy of arrest. Without condoning the students’ behavior at the Forum, broader principles have led the University to request that the criminal charges against the students be dropped.

I like the second paragraph, but I don't think much of the third. Does anyone seriously think that four students who stand up and start screaming at the director of the FBI as he gives a speech didn't know that they might be arrested?

And what exactly are these broader principles?

And why is it that no one at Harvard dares put his or her name to this statement?
 
Comments:
Harvard admitted to improperly arresting its own students -- which is a fairly extraordinary admission, given Harvard's famous reluctance to admit mistakes of any kind -- and you respond by saying you "don't think much of" this. That's deeply odd. Are you only concerned when those improperly arrested are Duke students?
 
I don't think much of the statement because it's so vaguely written, it has no educational power. On the one hand, on the other hand.... And releasing it after midnight is downright Bushian. The fact that no one will put his or her name to it is not the way a great university should conduct its business.
 
How exactly would you define "educational power," specifically in this context?
 
A greater discussion of the reasoning behind the decision, and particularly the principles involved.

Also the sense that Harvard cared enough about the issue to handle it straightforwardly, by releasing a statement in daylight, with a signatory.
 
I don't understand why the time of day when the statement was issued is relevant. Many people work late and send messages after hours because they've been trying to keep up with a demanding schedule. Sending a message at night makes it likely that it will be one of the first things people see in the morning.
 
Generally when a press person issues things after a newspaper daily deadline, it's because they're hoping it won't get picked up by newspapers, which may miss it that night and won't want to run it two days later, when, by newspaper standards, it's old news.
 
Incidentally, I don't blame John Longbrake for this. Sounds to me like he was just doing what he was told. When no one else wants to take responsibility for something, they trot the press people out and say, "*You* put your name on it."
 
Kind of like letting Mikey try it, if you know what I mean.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 / 4/1/07 - 5/1/07 / 5/1/07 - 6/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger