Shots In The Dark
Thursday, March 15, 2007
  Summers at Tufts: Wow
In the Crimson, Zach Seward reports on Larry Summers' speech at Tufts, where his impending appearance had generated some mild controversy.

If my reading of Seward's article is correct, Summers' appearance should generate far more controversy at Harvard than at Tufts.

Seward notes that there is also a long Harvard tradition of deposed administrators taking up the role of pesky gadfly.

That may be true, though I don't know Harvard history well enough to say so. (Citing Harry Lewis hardly constitutes a long tradition, and I wonder if it wouldn't be more accurate to call this a "recent phenomenon.")

But whatever is the case with "deposed administrators" becoming gadflies, there is no precedent that I'm aware of for a former president directly criticizing the Harvard faculty.

When Derek Bok left the Harvard presidency in 1991 and took an office in the Kennedy School, he made a scrupulous point of not speaking out on current Harvard affairs. It was unfair, he thought, to his successor, to have the old president lingering on campus and making life difficult for Neil Rudenstine.

Larry Summers is clearly not going to follow that model.

As Seward tells it, Summers...

...criticized the Harvard faculty and the curricular review.

“When university faculties are unwilling to take a stand on what constitutes the undergraduate experience for students, on what, if anything, somebody needs to function in today’s world, they license a position that all ideas are equally valid,” he said.

...criticized the final General Education report, saying...

I would have liked a somewhat better defined sense of what the crucial issues were that students needed to grapple with, and I would have welcomed a deeper commitment to faculty-student contact.”

...criticized Harvard professors' teaching ability, saying,

I can’t recall a single case when an effort was made to raid Harvard for a candidate who was an outstanding teacher.”

Well, he does speak his mind, doesn't he? (There's more in Seward's article.) I'll have some thoughts on the specifics of Summers criticisms, but all I can say is that if this is going to be Summers' approach to his post-presidency, then look out, Drew Faust!

Things around 02138 just got a lot more interesting.
 
Comments:
"I can’t recall a single case when an effort was made to raid Harvard for a candidate who was an outstanding teacher."

I think you are reading this wrong. I don't think he was criticizing Harvard profs by saying that no university would ever want a Harvard prof for his or her teaching ability (no one could seriously claim that NONE of the 700 or so professors in the FAS are excellent teachers). What Summers, I think, was saying is that higher ed in general poaches professors for their research, not their teaching (just as it grants tenure for research, not teaching). So his criticism is of higher ed, not Harvard, and is similar to criticisms made by MANY people -- including Derek Bok and Theda Skocpol -- that teaching is undervalued.
 
That would be the logical argument, but I don't know that that's what he meant. He was speaking in the context of claiming that the quality of Harvard teaching has dropped by 50% in the last twenty years, 75% in the last 40. (Don't ask me how you can quantify that, but he did.)
 
Of course, I wasn't there. Anyone who was?
 
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
 
Who was there? Paging Mr. Seward and Marks... paging Mr. Seward and Marks - please pick up the white courtesy phone... please pick up the white courtesy phone.
 
Yeah, right!

Commenter #1, is that true of American higher ed in general, or just large research institutions? Because there are a lot of small liberal arts colleges, and other places with emphases on teaching... They may not be as conventionally glamorous, but they're out there.

It is certainly true that Harvard is not primarily known for the quality of its teachers.

Faust has won some teaching awards, though, hasn't she? It will be interesting to see her take on this. RB, if you were her PR folk, what would you be advising her to do right now?
 
I would be advising her to an interview with me.

In fact, I *am* advising—well, asking—her to do an interview with me.

Beyond that, I think, it's not my place to say.
 
And she's tough to access? That's interesting.

It's not your place to say? Thought this was an opinion/ commentary blog, and you've written on spin/PR before ... Are you afraid answering the question will affect your getting the interview? Will you answer the question after the interview, should you get one?

This reticence makes for a Sad Emu. But I don't want to change my account name.
 
Richard, it is an exageration to say that things at 02138 got interesting because Summers opened his mouth...

The conference last night showed that he has not changed much. Proving the wisdom of those in the Corporation who said that he was unable to change and the wisdom of asking him to step aside.

What's funny is to see that his blunders as a regular Professor are inconsequential, nobody cares, in fact one can smile with generosity. It was the power that he had the ability to misuse as President of Harvard that caused the painful realization that someone unfit for the job could cause such harm to the institution.

As for his comment that he may write a book, let him try, that would be a first for him. In this, as in other areas, he really does not know what he is talking about when he makes that promise.

Harvard is in Tufts debt for this lecture and for all it teaches to those who care about Harvard. As for Larry, he should be free to go on the lecture circuit around universities talking all he wants about universities, that is if anyone would invite him again.
 
Agree this shows Summers has not changed. His description of a performance evaluation conversation between a dean and a professor is doubtless just what he thought he was doing with (to) Cornel West.
 
Yeah I agree! How would a performance evaluation conversation between President Faust and Professor Summers go?
It may go more or less like this:

- Larry, I have called you to Mass Hall to learn more about you have been up to lately. How exactly are you spending your time?

- Well Drew. I haven't been doing much. Some work managing the Hedge Fund, the usual trip to Davos, a lot of vacationing, and the occasional lecture here and there, but not much of substance really.

- I see Larry. I am sure you are aware of the fact that a University Professorship is the highest distinction the University confers in a member of the Professoriate. There is a lot of symbolism attached to these. Students and ordinary professors really look up to University Professors as higher than thou.

- Yes Drew, I am aware of the distinction which I confered upon myself. What is your point precisely?

- My point Larry is that you haven't exactly been living up to the part. This is in fact the reason I called you today. When was the last time you wrote something academic? a paper even?

-- Uuhh... dunno. I can't remember.

-- You see Larry. What would you do if you were in my position?
 
Sounds like some of the faculty (probably FAS) have arrived home from a tough day at the office, have had their dinner with a few glasses of wine or sherry, and are feeling just a bit emboldened, perhaps even surly.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger