Shots In The Dark
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
  Steak at the Penthouse Club
Last week, the Times' Frank Bruni reviewed the steakhouse at New York's Penthouse Club, which is, as one might guess, a New York strip club. (Hah! Sorry, that was too easy.) Apparently the place has a serious chef.

The review itself is pretty entertaining, especially when you consider that the writer is not known for, um, frequenting such establishments. "Great food often pops up where you least expect it," Bruni writes. I'll bet.



An employee of the
Penthouse Club
.


Anyway, today the letters are in, and they range from pretty funny—one correspondent asks if they deliver—to huffing and puffing.

Here's the latter—see what you think.

To the Editor:

I write with distaste concerning Frank Bruni’s review of Robert’s Steakhouse, located in a strip bar. Stripping and the sale of sexual services arise in a world where privileged men can freely buy and sell female bodies, and where women have limited economic choices. It involves constant hustling, even in the “best” clubs.

This form of “entertainment” flourishes in the inequality of power between men and women, and sexual selling relies on women fitting themselves into the stereotypes that attract and flatter male clients.

One wonders, would Mr. Bruni be willing to sit through a minstrel show for some really good fried chicken?

Pamela Rubin

Halifax, Nova Scotia

The writer is the coordinator of the Women’s Innovative Justice Initiative.

I was all prepared to write this letter off until that last sentence when I thought, hmmm, maybe she has a point there. But then there are those people who say that stripping is an economic good for these women, free speech advocates who say it's a right, and feminists who talk about the positive power of female nudity, etc., etc.

Me, I like a good steak, but I have never been to the Penthouse Club. A writer friend of mine did, once, but on an expense account. Which only goes to show that, sometimes, I wonder why I chose to write about higher education.

Anyway, it's worth checking out the letters. There's also one about whether Whole Foods is straying from its roots, which is probably important for you Cambridge folks.
 
Comments:
Whole Foods straying from its roots may strike you as an easy thing to be glib about, but it touches on an important topic -- the whole creeping, food industrial complex. I'm sure you read Michael Pollan's "Omnivore's Dilemma" which covered this quite well. It was his public quarrel with Whole Foods that started this whole thing. It's an important topic -- see, for example, the excellent op-ed on how pigs are treated by Nicolette Niman in today's Times -- and something you should take more seriously.

And by the way, with respect to the Penthouse Club. When will American's finally escape from the puritan chains that have bound us for so long? We are still so afraid of sex...
 
I'm sure I should care more about Whole Foods, but I can't be serious about everything all the time, now can I?
 
All I'm saying is you obviously care about animal rights. The food industrial complex is closely related to that issue.
 
Whole Foods is but the frontman for the Food Industrial Complex -- but trust me, you aren't going to get the blogger to agree with that. He likes his pig -- er, ham -- sandwiches way too much.

As for the Penthouse restaurant, there really isn't very much "sex" of the sort anon I is talking about going on in there. Indeed, I would argue that strip clubs are the ultimate American take on sex: fake, costly and (unlike a good massage by a 14 year old) ultimately unsatisfying.
 
Richard, yes, you can and should be serious about everything all the time. Our nation turns its lonely eyes towards you. We need your guidance.
 
I'd like to understand what the letter writer (Pamela Rubin) means when she says stripping represents the inequality of the sexes. I honestly don't get that. Anyone who has been to a strip club knows that the women hold all the cards. Yes, they are seeking money from customers and may degrade themselves to get it. But the men are helpless in those circumstances. The women set the rules and the men have to pay up or they don't get to have their fun.
 
Re the last comment: The same is true of prostitution. And freak shows. And minstrelsy, for that matter. Fried chicken anyone?
 
Anon 5:49 -- I disagree. I think there are significant differences between stripping and prostitution, freak shows and minstrelry. In contrast to prostitution, stripping is safe. And in contrast to minstrel shows (or freak shows) it does not feed into a degrading stereotype (blacks as subhuman) unless you think sexual desire is inherently degrading. If so, why? It is, after all, a human, natural desire. If there is something "wrong" with stripping it is with the men who are cheating on their wifes, girlfriends or wasting money on lap dances.
 
It was awfully hard for me to resist posting a crack about "strip steaks," but there, I resisted.
 
Anon 6:54 Entertainment is a natural human desire; minstrelsy satisfies it. Sex is a natural human desire; by your lights, prostitution ought to satisfy. Stripping is safe? Tell that to the stripper from Ohio who was recently murdered by a wacko. The truth is, it's a "life", and it's hard to get out of, and a lot of women have been put on the road to ruin by it. And the suggestion that there isn't inequality in the situation is just weird. Sure, women hold the cards; and you can look down on the men, who are "cheating" on their wives and girlfriends and stupidly depleting their bank accounts. But if stripping represents your version of an empowered woman, I'm curious what YOUR wife or girlfriend is like. (Or you, if you happen to be a woman.)
 
Steak and silicone, yeah!

Peter Laurence Critchell IV
 
There were three before you?
 
Yes, though not all as eminent.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name: Richard Bradley
Location: New York, New York,
ARCHIVES
2/1/05 - 3/1/05 / 3/1/05 - 4/1/05 / 4/1/05 - 5/1/05 / 5/1/05 - 6/1/05 / 6/1/05 - 7/1/05 / 7/1/05 - 8/1/05 / 8/1/05 - 9/1/05 / 9/1/05 - 10/1/05 / 10/1/05 - 11/1/05 / 11/1/05 - 12/1/05 / 12/1/05 - 1/1/06 / 1/1/06 - 2/1/06 / 2/1/06 - 3/1/06 / 3/1/06 - 4/1/06 / 4/1/06 - 5/1/06 / 5/1/06 - 6/1/06 / 6/1/06 - 7/1/06 / 7/1/06 - 8/1/06 / 8/1/06 - 9/1/06 / 9/1/06 - 10/1/06 / 10/1/06 - 11/1/06 / 11/1/06 - 12/1/06 / 12/1/06 - 1/1/07 / 1/1/07 - 2/1/07 / 2/1/07 - 3/1/07 / 3/1/07 - 4/1/07 /


Powered by Blogger