Send As SMS
Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
  The Second Coming of Jeffrey Epstein
The Times finally picks up the case of Jeffrey Epstein, the pervy billionaire who likes rub-and-tugs from underage girls. The piece focuses on the preferential treatment Epstein clearly received from the Palm Beach district attorney, but breaks little news. It is rare, though, that you'll find paragraphs like the one below in the New York Times:

Most of the girls, according to the police, said Mr. Epstein had masturbated during the massages, and a few said he had penetrated them with his fingers or penis. They identified him in photos and accurately described the inside of his home. Some recalled that his employees had fed them snacks or rented them cars.

That whole paragraph is creepy...but perhaps the creepiest part is the line, "some recalled that his employees had fed them snacks." Like what? Milk and cookies?

Meanwhile, here's another interesting point: Epstein, says the Times, has "pledged" $30 million to Harvard.

I was under the impression that Epstein had already given the money to Harvard. Is this wrong, and Epstein is just another Summers' friend who pledged enormous amounts of money only never to make good on his promise? And if Epstein hasn't already given the university the money, should Harvard now decline the pledge?

These are all answerable questions. Crimson, it's time to hit the ground running....
 
Comments:
I don't get it. Don't you serve snacks to people you invite to your home?
 
Are you sure it's only the second coming?
 
Could you find some other word instead of "pervy"? It's getting boring.
 
Your suggestions welcome.
 
Gross, disgusting, filthy, repulsive, creepy, dirty, queer, sick, sicko, aberrant, deviant, debased, debauched, kinky, unnatural, twisted, warped....

Gosh, all this just because he got a rub and tug from a few young girls? How many titans of industry, how many celebs, how many professional athletes, how many crocodile hunters, how many writers, how many bloggers (!) would there be if you removed all those who could be called pervy?
 
Oh come on!
 
I'm with anon 4:08 on this one....
 
How come?
 
You're right -- the Crimson is coming around to this story really really slowly.
 
3:53 PM...if you think that many people are "pervy", I would have to say you have a "pervy" view of life...then again, maybe some of your words are better...like twisted, warped...
 
If the Crimson is doing its job, it will follow up on this story and get the Harvard connection. (To its credit, the Crimson was the first to report the original story in the Boston area.)
The Harvard connection is first and foremost Henry Rosovsky, who made sure that Epstein received all the privileges of the biggest donors. Invitation to honorary degree dinner, access to the most prestigious events, and so on. Summers also courted Epstein, at Rosovsky's urgings. So the Crimson should ask R. when is he going to speak out. And Summers: would he reject or return a gift from this kind of person -- as he did with the gift from UAE President Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan?
 
If the Crimson is doing its job, it will follow up on this story and get the Harvard connection. (To its credit, the Crimson was the first to report the original story in the Boston area.)
The Harvard connection is first and foremost Henry Rosovsky, who made sure that Epstein received all the privileges of the biggest donors. Invitation to honorary degree dinner, access to the most prestigious events, and so on. Summers also courted Epstein, at Rosovsky's urgings. So the Crimson should ask R. when is he going to speak out. And Summers: would he reject or return a gift from this kind of person -- as he did with the gift from UAE President Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan?
 
No way they will turn down the $30 M (if it's only a pledge) as long as it is all sub iudice and Dershowitz is defending Epstein: innocent until acquitted by reason of wealth and harrassment of the not so bright or famous. Go for it, Alan, we're all depending on you!
 
Someone explain to me: why shouldn't they take his money, even assuming he's convicted of sex with a minor (or whatever)? Since when do powerful institutions scrutinize every dollar they receive on moral grounds? If you believe in Harvard's mission, taking the money will add to, not subtract from, the world's moral treasury. It isn't like he's a terrorist or a member of the mafia, which would perhaps taint the money itself. He's a wealthy financier. So he has some loathsome personal habits -- so do you, me, the rest of us. It's a question of degree and drawing the line at this guy seems idealistic to the point of naivete.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2005 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2005 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2005 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2005 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2005 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2006 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2006 - 03/31/2006 / 04/01/2006 - 04/30/2006 / 05/01/2006 - 05/31/2006 / 06/01/2006 - 06/30/2006 / 07/01/2006 - 07/31/2006 / 08/01/2006 - 08/31/2006 / 09/01/2006 - 09/30/2006 /


Powered by Blogger