Send As SMS
Shots In The Dark
Monday, August 07, 2006
  You Heard It Here First: Ann Coulter Is Over
In her latest column, Ann Coulter says that there's about a 50% chance that Hillary Clinton will "come out of the closet." Not too long ago, she suggested that Bill Clinton was a latent homosexual.

Ann poses a dilemma for me. I know her from my days as an editor at George, when she wrote a column for the magazine. (It was outrageous, but not nearly as bilious as her more recent writings.) In person, she is unexpectedly fun, funny and charming. Seriously. She's good company.

But I'd be hard-pressed to find a single thing she's ever said that I agree with, and I think that the nastiness of her commentary is a negative force in the culture. (I do give her the credit, though, of thinking that she means what she says. She is completely consistent in public and in private.)

So, trying to analyze Ann dispassionately...I have to say that I think she has peaked; her cultural moment is passing; and her cultural influence will diminish steadily.

Consider the remarks above as an example. Ann has lost her power to shock; her put-downs and caricatures have become boring and predictable. Which puts her in an unfortunate dynamic; she must either try to become more serious, in which case she alienates her nutty right-wing base, or she must become ever more outlandish, pleasing the base but losing more general appeal. It's the same thing that happened with Father Coughlin and, more recently, Rush Limbaugh.

I'm not saying she won't still sell lots of books and be a talk-radio presence. Her latest, Godless, is at #5 on the NYT bestseller list. Rush Limbaugh still has an audience of millions too; yet his ability to have an impact on those who don't already agree with everything he says has become minimal to nil.

Ann's act has grown stale. And in this time when the country has so many serious challenges, that development is long overdue. Name-calling won't cut it anymore.
 
Comments:
It's icky when you call people by their first names just because you know them slightly, used to know them more than slightly or met them a few times. Calling her "Coulter" would allow me to see through to your point a little easier. That said, I agree with you.
 
Icky? Don't be silly. I hired Ann to write the column, edited her for several months, and have spent a fair amount of time socializing with her. It'd feel ridiculous for me to call her Coulter.
 
Okay, Richard.
 
Could you just call her "Fang" in future? She'd like it, and so would I.
 
She's clearly become a parody of herself. There will come a time when Bush, Fox News, Ann Coulter and the like will be remembered as a national joke and national tragedy all rolled up into one.
 
Re the previous comment, kind of like the Gore and Kerry campaigns, huh? I too tire of the Bushies--ready for eight years of John McCain after he trounces Hillary in '08.
 
To the last poster: If I'm not mistaken, you're the person who seems to think John Kerry is a "coward". (Which makes Bush and Cheney, who sat out Vietnam -- what, exactly?) Anyway, the Right has had a fine old time trashing "Liberals" like Gore and Kerry while leading this country down the road to imperial ruin. If Hilary runs in 08, and McCain beats her, fine. John McCain -- unlike the chicken hawks who've been running this country to ground for the last six years -- is a viable conservative option. And he, by the way, would never brand John Kerry a coward -- nor does he indulge in the kind of cheap rhetoric Ann Coulter employs to sell books. Speaking of Fang, I wonder how many books she's going to sell once the Chinese have acquired all of our publishing houses out of bankruptcy?
 
To 3:10, 2:10 here. Where did I call Kerry a coward? I thought he, like Gore, ran a miserable campaign--Swift Boat veterans or not. Not sure where that came from. I think he's a worthless Senator, but his service record--while largely irrelevant--is laudable, even if his post-war parade seemed a little too career minded. Maybe you've confused me with another poster.

And re McCain, I do hope that his integrity can save the party. The primary will be the big fight; Hillary would fall to him in a landslide. She would also lose to Giuliani or Allen. She might beat Romney--exactly why he won't get the nomination.
 
I think both McCain and Hillary would have trouble winning, for different reasons. McCain would have trouble winning the nomination; Hillary would have huge trouble winning a national election.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2005 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2005 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2005 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2005 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2005 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2006 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2006 - 03/31/2006 / 04/01/2006 - 04/30/2006 / 05/01/2006 - 05/31/2006 / 06/01/2006 - 06/30/2006 / 07/01/2006 - 07/31/2006 / 08/01/2006 - 08/31/2006 /


Powered by Blogger