Send As SMS
Shots In The Dark
Friday, July 07, 2006
  Why Root for France?
A poster below makes an eloquent case for Italy, writing:

You said: "How can you not root for France?" Quite easy as a matter of fact.
If you were here in Tuscany you would have seen the spontaneity of the celebrations in the early hours of Wednesday morning, after the Azzurri scored those two classically beautiful goals. It is easy, therefore, to root for a team representing a country that, unlike its Sunday opponent, lives life joyously.

On another note...one thing, once again, struck four of us watching the Portugal-France game last evening. For a country that is so blatantly racist,there was some typical French hypocrisy, in this case in fielding a team with so many (outstanding) black players. But then again, unless the country can use them (e.g.North African Arabs, Jews, blacks), to its advantage, the history of France is replete with far too many instances of degradation (and worse).
It should be a good game on Sunday. Vai Azzurri!


I have no doubt that the celebrations in Tuscany were wonderful; trust me, I'd have been more than happy to be at them, in which case I would have kept my support for France to myself. And as I wrote before, those two goals were gorgeous, and all credit must go to the Italians for coming out in that overtime fired up and determined to win, which they did.

Moreover, I take the point about France and racism, but a World Cup victory by a team dominated by black players might help that problem.

The poster ignores completely, however, my argument that the Italians degrade the game with their readiness to flop and their histrionic acting. It's no surprise that, to illustrate a story about the abundance of called fouls during this World Cup, the Times chose a picture of an Italian looking like he's trying out for Le Nozze di Figaro.

Until the Italians start to play like real men, I can't root for them. Remember the Socceroos!



An Italian player plummets to the turf...dramatically. Not to mention the hair.
 
Comments:
I guess all this macho chest-beating (e.g., "real men") is meant to be ironic or something. For someone who's athletic challenges are presumably limited to the gym, you're pretty free with all these sly fag-baiting comments. Can you post a picture of you on a field of contest? Would it be a pretty sight?
 
Fag-baiting comments? Don't be silly. It has nothing to do with sexuality, and I reject your homophobic suggestion that it does. It has to do with character. Manliness, even, to borrow a term. And that has nothing to do with who you sleep with.

For the record, I'll have you know that I was once chosen the Yale Daily News "intramural athlete of the week," for which I received a shiny red satin Budweiser jacket, which I passed along to, um, a gay friend of mine, who appreciated its camp aesthetic.
 
Manliness has nothing to do with who you sleep with? Well then, what does it have to do with?
If the US women's soccer team were less prone to taking dives than the Chinese team, would that make them more "manly"? Why use the term, if not in the narrow stereotypical sense? Isn't the converse of your comment that the Italian player was acting rather Richard Simmons-ish?
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2005 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2005 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2005 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2005 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2005 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2006 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2006 - 03/31/2006 / 04/01/2006 - 04/30/2006 / 05/01/2006 - 05/31/2006 / 06/01/2006 - 06/30/2006 / 07/01/2006 - 07/31/2006 /


Powered by Blogger