Send As SMS
Shots In The Dark
Tuesday, July 11, 2006
  If Italian Footballers Played in the NFL
A writer for SI discusses the problem of flopping in soccer...and I quote.

Zinedine Zidane is not a flopper or a whiner or a moaner. I have never seen him pull one of those scenes from the last act of La Boheme, enacting his death tableau on the field after the merest brush of contact. I haven't seen him lying there at death's door while they go through with the most ridiculous of all dramas, the entry of the stretcher.

Imagine if the NFL were like that. Half a dozen stretchers called for during the course of the game, whereupon the nearly deceased leaps off it, shakes off the very fingers of the Evil One and trots back onto the field. Maybe Zidane was tired of all this, of this travesty, which rewards all the things that we were once taught were cowardly, but can be used to great advantage in this game.

So Zidane slammed a guy. He lost it. Writers all over the world are competing with themselves to heap scorn on France's greatest player. You know something? I don't blame him for getting sore. Almost every time I could find him on the screen, he had someone tugging at his shirt, tripping him or messing with him in some sneaky way.

The problem is he doesn't hit the canvas as the rest of those prima donnas do. So the ref must figure nothing is happening. Sure, he should have held off on the head butt, but to put the defeat of his team on his shoulders is a reach....

You can read the rest of the piece here. Obviously, I agree with it.
 
Comments:
Agreed. Flopping is always bashed in the American sports media and certainly by our fans. The Italians might have gotten away with it in the World Cup, but they won't be able to dodge the controversy waiting for them at home in which national gamesmanship goes even further...the widespread bribing of officials.
 
The writer, like the blogger, is conflating two issues: whether Zidane should be blamed for harming his team by head butting the Italian and whether the Italian (player/team/people) should be blamed for engaging in "unsportsmanlike" behavior. The first issue cannot be disputed: yes, Zidane can be blamed for potentially blowing the World Cup. The second is much more complex, and we do the game, and the Italians, a disservice by turning this into a black hat vs. white hat (or Kevin Spacey vs. Brad Pitt) scenario. Basically the two issues are unrelated. Zidane broke the rules and harmed his team. The Italian helped his team, within the rules, but may have committed an ethical foul. The questions are: by whose standards? Zidane may not be a "flopper", but is he to be praised because he endured the Italians' physical play like a man until someone called him a terrorist and a whore's son and then reacted by head butting the guy? I.e., are we now justifying his flagrant and dangerous foul on some ethical level? If so, shouldn't we fold into the equation Zidane's prior acts of viciousness? Perhaps those can be justified on the same grounds (he was being harassed, bothered) -- but if you ask me that argument just proves too much. It's fine to assert that the Italians' behavior was unappetizing, but it does not bear comparison to Zidane's shameful breakdown.
 
Anon 1 here. Aside from Rich's argument--which I more or less agree with--the two issues I'm comparing, Italian player "flopping" and some of those same players' involvement in more tangible corruption with their club teams (the bribery scandal currently blowing wide open) are not disparate issues or circumstances but rather different degrees of the same fever.

Zidane acted out in a violent manner, provoked or not, but his motivations were obviously not the pursuit of victory. His hot headed reaction can be fairly--and easily--shunned. What's more complicated, and more interesting, is the Italians and their "diving" and bribing. Those are team-wide approaches, and, when it comes to the bribery and fixing of league games, possibly nationwide.
 
RICH, YOU SON OF A TERRORIST WHORE!

See folks, it's pretty bad (feel free to head-butt me, Rich).
 
Anon #2 here - First, it seems Anon #1 thought I was responding to him, but I wasn't; I was responding to the argument of the SI journalist cited in the blog itself. Second, I think Anon #1 is mixed up in the facts. The Italians may commit the sin of diving, but so do many other teams, and it is legal. The sports governing bodies can deal with it, but they haven't. Because the Italians do play defensive ("ugly") soccer, they must appeal often to the refs, and perhaps have become quite expert at it; but it is just silly, and borderline, racist to talk as if "the Italians" do anything on a teamwide basis -- as if other nationalities/teams don't. Second, the commenter seems to be under the impression that the Italians players -- who do the diving -- are involved in the alleged bribing. None of the players have been accused of bribing; and if you are suggesting that the teams dive as a matter of team policy (the way Juvuntus has been accused of bribing as an organization) then I'd like to know your source.

Re the immediately preceding poster, watch it -- Rich doesn't head butt, he deletes.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2005 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2005 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2005 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2005 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2005 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2006 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2006 - 03/31/2006 / 04/01/2006 - 04/30/2006 / 05/01/2006 - 05/31/2006 / 06/01/2006 - 06/30/2006 / 07/01/2006 - 07/31/2006 /


Powered by Blogger