Send As SMS
Shots In The Dark
Monday, May 01, 2006
  Harvard: Follow the Money
The Crimson reports today on Harvard's oft-delayed capital campaign, noting that it won't start until 2008 at least, according to outgoing finance chief Donella Rapier. The argument, of course, is that a major campaign can't start until a new president is in place.

Rapier isn't specific about when in 2008, but it would have to be the fall at the earliest. Assuming a new president takes office in September '07, that person would need at least a year before beginning a huge fund drive that would consume vast quantities of his or her time—if not longer. Neil Rudenstine, remember, took two years before he commenced his hugely successful drive, and Rudenstine wasn't inheriting a wounded and divided university.

So perhaps 2009, then?

In any case, the consequences of this timetable are interesting, because candidates for the president's job are a) going to have to be good at raising money, and b) willing to start a huge campaign very soon after taking office—something Larry Summers was promised he would not have to do. That might well discourage some qualified candidates from considering the Harvard job.

Plus, there's the whole unreported story of what a mess the college's finances are said to be in—the gifts counted as booked but not, the massive financial commitments to the sciences in Alston, the soaring costs of the central administration, the cooking of the fundraising numbers for the past couple of years.....
_______________________________________________________________

Correction. As I've mentioned before, I'm always appreciative when readers point out mistakes—I dish it out, etc.—and there are a couple big ones in the post above. Donnella Rapier is, of course, not Harvard's "outgoing fnance chief"—that was Ann Berman—who has already departed—she is the Vice-President for Alumni Affairs and Development. My apologies to Ms. Rapier, Ms. Berman, and Mr. Berman, the valiant husband/poster who has weighed in more than once to correct me when I have erred. Mr. Berman (if your surname is indeed that of your wife's), may I suggest a blog? I have a feeling you might be very good at this....
 
Comments:
Richard,
I was positive that I have been married to the outgoing "finance chief" (CFO),for almost the last 29 years. Imagine my surprise when I learned from you that either my wife is not the "outgoing finance chief" or that if I have been married to the finance chief, it has been to Donella Rapier. As much as I like Donella,I have been very happily married to Ann Berman, the "finance chief". Donella is the VP for Alumni Affairs and Development. By the way, my wife stepped down on April 3rd., so she is more than "outgoing."
Sloppy, sloppy Richard.
 
Richard,
There is no Mr. Berman in this marriage, although I have no problem with the moniker; in fact it's grown on me during the last 29 years ( and I've been called much worse). I'll pass on the blog; there is, already, too much information out in cyberspace and what could I possibly offer that was new and interesting. Why is my alter ego laughing at that last comment?
Sam Spektor
 
Well, Sam, my critics would suggest that none of these concerns stop me from blogging....

Anyway, my apologies again for my gaffes this morning.
 
The Crimson missed a story you would have cherished, Richard. The unveiling of the Rudenstein portrait on Monday evening. The story buried inside only hinted at the tension in the room. Rudenstein gave a passionate defense of the faculty as an agent of creative change, and was uncharacteristically direct in his criticism of "authoritarian" leadership by presidents. The faculty needs to be led, but by taking their ideas and shaping them and the group to ends that all share. Even Pres. Eliot, one of the most authoritarian presidents knew well that he could not order the faculty around. At that point, Summers, who had been standing in the front of the audience, turned and left (either the room, according to some accounts or back to the refreshement table, according to others). There were some gasps. Rudenstine even pointededly noted that the faculty supported him when he took the unpopular move of creating a tax to start Allston development. Many faculty were surprised at Rudenstein's unchracteristically direct comments. Most thought this was great (the audience was clearly on his side given the occasion). But some thought it was not right to humiliate Summers in this way. In any case a dramatic moment that was not to be missed, though the Crimson did. Too bad you weren't there, Richard.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home
Politics, Media, Academia, Pop Culture, and More

Name:richard
Location:New York, New York
ARCHIVES
02/01/2005 - 02/28/2005 / 03/01/2005 - 03/31/2005 / 04/01/2005 - 04/30/2005 / 05/01/2005 - 05/31/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 06/30/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 07/31/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 08/31/2005 / 09/01/2005 - 09/30/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 10/31/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 11/30/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 12/31/2005 / 01/01/2006 - 01/31/2006 / 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 / 03/01/2006 - 03/31/2006 / 04/01/2006 - 04/30/2006 / 05/01/2006 - 05/31/2006 /


Powered by Blogger