More on the Shleifer Scandal
Here's a quote from the Crimson that I'd like to see someone further explore:
"McClintick’s article alleges that Summers knew that Shleifer and Zimmerman had been investing in Russia, but not that Summers knew specific details of the investments. "I'm not a lawyer, and yet, I wonder: Did Summers have to know specific details of the investments to know that they were unethical and very possibly illegal? (Which is to say, was it legal for Shleifer to make
any investments in Russia?)
And what level of knowledge is required for Summers himself to become legally vulnerable? This is an answerable question, Crimson folks: Some smart former U.S. attorney could tell you whether Summers was required to do more than simply tell Shleifer to be careful because "the world is a shitty place."
McClintick's piece tiptoes around the question of what Summers knew and when, probably because he couldn't prove anything. And this is the one area where I would criticize what is otherwise a remarkable piece of journalism; McClintick clearly implies that Summers (and Martin Feldstein) knew pretty well what was going on there, but he never directly addresses the issue.
Perhaps a follow-up?